Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(devcontainer): update image: v1.0.3 #2736

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024
Merged

chore(devcontainer): update image: v1.0.3 #2736

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 29, 2024

Conversation

tarrencev
Copy link
Contributor

@tarrencev tarrencev commented Nov 29, 2024

Automated changes by create-pull-request GitHub action

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Updated Docker image version to enhance performance and stability across various workflows.
  • Chores

    • Modified Docker image version in the development environment and multiple GitHub Actions workflows for consistency and improvements.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Walkthrough

Ohayo, sensei! This pull request updates the Docker image version across several configuration files related to a Rust development environment. The image version is changed from v1.0.2 to v1.0.3 in the .devcontainer/devcontainer.json, various GitHub Actions workflow files (bench.yml, ci.yml, and release-dispatch.yml), ensuring all jobs utilize the newer image. No other significant changes to the configurations or workflows are present.

Changes

File Change Summary
.devcontainer/devcontainer.json Updated Docker image version from v1.0.2 to v1.0.3.
.github/workflows/bench.yml Updated Docker image version from v1.0.2 to v1.0.3 for bench-katana and bench-sozo jobs.
.github/workflows/ci.yml Updated Docker image version from v1.0.2 to v1.0.3 across multiple jobs: test, ensure-wasm, dojo-core-test, dojo-spawn-and-move-example-test, clippy, fmt, docs, ensure-windows.
.github/workflows/release-dispatch.yml Updated Docker image version from v1.0.2 to v1.0.3 for propose-release job.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • glihm

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

Line range hint 34-196: Consider implementing a version management strategy for container images.

While the current update is straightforward, here are some suggestions for robust version management:

  1. Use SHA digests alongside tags for immutable references
  2. Consider implementing a version matrix strategy for testing against multiple image versions
  3. Document the process for version updates in the repository

Would you like me to help create a template for documenting the version update process?

🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)

61-61: the runner of "actions/checkout@v3" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue

(action)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c65c257 and 02d2190.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .devcontainer/devcontainer.json (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/bench.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/ci.yml (7 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release-dispatch.yml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
  • .devcontainer/devcontainer.json
  • .github/workflows/bench.yml
  • .github/workflows/release-dispatch.yml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)

34-34: Ohayo sensei! The image version updates look consistent.

All container-based jobs have been updated to use ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:v1.0.3. The changes are consistent across all jobs in the workflow.

Let's verify the new image version and check for any breaking changes:

Also applies to: 59-59, 126-126, 142-142, 157-157, 166-166, 175-175

✅ Verification successful

Ohayo sensei! The image version updates are consistent and verified.

The verification confirms:

  • All jobs consistently use ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:v1.0.3
  • The image was recently published (2024-11-29) and is also tagged as latest
  • No breaking changes are indicated as it's a minor version bump (v1.0.2 to v1.0.3)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the container image version consistency and check changelog

# Check if all container jobs use the same version
echo "Checking image version consistency..."
rg "ghcr.io/dojoengine/dojo-dev:" -A 1

# Fetch the container image metadata to check for breaking changes
echo "Checking container image metadata..."
gh api \
  -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
  -H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
  "/orgs/dojoengine/packages/container/dojo-dev/versions" | jq '.[] | select(.metadata.container.tags[] | contains("v1.0.3"))'

Length of output: 1026

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.47%. Comparing base (c65c257) to head (02d2190).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2736   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.47%   56.47%           
=======================================
  Files         421      421           
  Lines       53976    53976           
=======================================
  Hits        30482    30482           
  Misses      23494    23494           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@glihm glihm merged commit cd80507 into main Nov 29, 2024
14 checks passed
@glihm glihm deleted the bump-devcontainer branch November 29, 2024 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants