-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 509
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code refactoring and implement primary constructor #4747
Conversation
@dotnet-policy-service agree |
I personally have issues with primary constructors and expression bodies (when not very simple) as it makes the code more dense and harder to read. Not speaking for others though who might have a different opinion. |
In my opinion, it would be better if the new features of C# were integrated into the project. Other people can also see and benefit from this feature. It can reduce the number of lines of code. In my opinion, on the contrary, it makes reading the code even simpler. It will be easier for someone who uses Record, it also has a similar feature. |
I agree with this. |
Can you tell me where the part that creates confusion in the changes I made? |
To me it isn't about confusion. It is about the value of these code style changes. They are providing very little value for the effort to review them (even though the effort isn't large). And since this is just a one time change, more code will get written in the future not following these changes. |
I will make these changes myself when I have time. I love reading code and making edits. I would be happier if I contributed to the project. Because programming is my favorite hobby |
Closing per the above discussion. |
Okay. Thanks |
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow