Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge main to features/list-patterns #59024

Merged
merged 215 commits into from
Jan 23, 2022

Conversation

dotnet-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an automatically generated pull request from main into features/list-patterns.

Once all conflicts are resolved and all the tests pass, you are free to merge the pull request. 🐯

Troubleshooting conflicts

Identify authors of changes which introduced merge conflicts

Scroll to the bottom, then for each file containing conflicts copy its path into the following searches:

Usually the most recent change to a file between the two branches is considered to have introduced the conflicts, but sometimes it will be necessary to look for the conflicting lines and check the blame in each branch. Generally the author whose change introduced the conflicts should pull down this PR, fix the conflicts locally, then push up a commit resolving the conflicts.

Resolve merge conflicts using your local repo

Sometimes merge conflicts may be present on GitHub but merging locally will work without conflicts. This is due to differences between the merge algorithm used in local git versus the one used by GitHub.

git fetch --all
git checkout -t upstream/merges/main-to-features/list-patterns
git reset --hard upstream/features/list-patterns
git merge upstream/main
# Fix merge conflicts
git commit
git push upstream merges/main-to-features/list-patterns --force

Youssef1313 and others added 18 commits January 21, 2022 00:20
…plicitInterfaceMemberCompletionProvider.CompletionSymbolDisplay.cs

Co-authored-by: CyrusNajmabadi <cyrus.najmabadi@gmail.com>
#58657 was also a fix for 58514, by forcing the compiler to spill sequences in this scenario as well. This just adds tests to verify the scenario is addressed.

Fixes #58514.
* Fix ParseVBErrorOrWarning

* Update Vbc.cs

* internal -> private

* Added test to verify error reporting from the VB compiler.

Verifies the text used for Microsoft.Build.Tasks.CodeAnalysis.UnitTests.CheckErrorAndWarningParsing.

* Added test to verify that column numbers insert correctly.

ErrorLoggerEngine was added to capture the parse results as produced by Microsoft.Build.Shared.EventArgsFormatting.

* Needs a space between the end parenthesis and the colon.

* Update ErrorLoggerEngine.cs

* Update Vbc.cs

* Update VbcTests.cs

* Make internal and fix spanish test failure

* Address feedback

Co-authored-by: Adam Biser <adambiser@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Julien Couvreur <julien.couvreur@gmail.com>
…57667)

* Allow xml docs to still be created when 'emit metadata only' is on.

* Add VB tests

* Simplify

* Simplify

* Update src/Compilers/Core/Portable/Compilation/Compilation.cs

* Fix

* Remove parameter

* Pass in doc mode explicitly

* Actually show the full xml docs we get

* Update src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Emit/Emit/CompilationEmitTests.cs

* Update src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Emit/Emit/CompilationEmitTests.cs

* Update src/Compilers/CSharp/Test/Emit/Emit/CompilationEmitTests.cs
…quire it in the constructor

This change defers the MEF part creation exception in MEF 2 scenarios
from the call to GetExports to the call (if any) to Lazy<>.Value. Rather
than reject the part from the catalog entirely, this change allows the
part to be included as long as it is not accessed.
Assert compiler diagnostics in param-null checking test
Update CompilerNuGetCheckerUtil.cs
…mpletion

don't include implicit/explicit keywords when completing explicit interface operator
Export VSTypeScriptFormattingService using a factory instead of directly
Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Auto-approval

@dotnet-bot dotnet-bot merged commit 5ea7b62 into features/list-patterns Jan 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.