JIT: Remove fallthrough constraint for BBJ_SWITCH -> BBJ_COND
conversion
#105651
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed this unnecessary fallthrough check while exploring if we can avoid calling
fgUpdateFlowGraph
again after reordering blocks, as the new layout doesn't introduce any new blocks. Switch conversion shouldn't rely on what the current block layout happens to be when it's run; if we can do these transformations before running block layout, then removing the post-layoutfgUpdateFlowGraph
call should be a no-diff change.Local diffs are relatively small, though more
BBJ_SWITCH -> BBJ_COND
conversion tends to unlock other flow opts, like more block compaction (we currently skip compactingtarget
intoblock
iftarget
is the successor a switch block, as we don't bother updating the switch block's successor table).