-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
Port coreclr interpreter to riscv64 #121276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@jkoritzinsky, this is an initial interpreter port. I wasn't able to run InterpreterTester since src/tests build is broken with |
Co-authored-by: Tomasz Sowiński <tomeksowi@gmail.com>
|
@janvorli, PTAL. Bulk change for the initial port. Testing is currently blocked #115622 (comment), so I couldn’t run tests yet. This is a good checkpoint; follow-up updates will be small and incremental. riscv64 leg is now green, remaining failures are unrelated. |
| add_compile_definitions($<${FEATURE_CORECLR_CACHED_INTERFACE_DISPATCH}:FEATURE_CACHED_INTERFACE_DISPATCH>) | ||
| add_compile_definitions($<${FEATURE_CORECLR_VIRTUAL_STUB_DISPATCH}:FEATURE_VIRTUAL_STUB_DISPATCH>) | ||
|
|
||
| include_directories(${RUNTIME_DIR}) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@am11 I assume these added includes are not really needed and they were added for possible future needs to unify it with vm folder includes, right?
I think we don't need to add it to the pal's CMakeLists.txt file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
They are needed because the inline TLS is now used in src/coreclr/pal/inc/unixasmmacrosriscv64.inc, which is further referenced in debug among other places. I only added it to projects which were failing to build.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you!
No description provided.