Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/7.0] Update dependencies from dotnet/llvm-project #81424

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Jan 31, 2023

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/llvm-project

  • Subscription: dc7edec6-2e27-40ef-139c-08da7ef5fa55
  • Build: 20230130.2
  • Date Produced: January 30, 2023 6:24:16 PM UTC
  • Commit: 51a9b83c7e31bf75af6e54b4744c6115de6f9d31
  • Branch: refs/heads/dotnet/release/7.0

… 20230130.2

runtime.linux-arm64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.linux-arm64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.linux-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.linux-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.osx.10.12-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.osx.10.12-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.win-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.win-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools
 From Version 11.1.0-alpha.1.22614.1 -> To Version 11.1.0-alpha.1.23080.2
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Jan 31, 2023
… 20230130.2

runtime.linux-arm64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.linux-arm64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.linux-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.linux-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.osx.10.12-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.osx.10.12-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.win-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.win-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools
 From Version 11.1.0-alpha.1.22614.1 -> To Version 11.1.0-alpha.1.23080.2
… 20230130.2

runtime.linux-arm64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.linux-arm64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.linux-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.linux-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.osx.10.12-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.osx.10.12-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools , runtime.win-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Sdk , runtime.win-x64.Microsoft.NETCore.Runtime.Mono.LLVM.Tools
 From Version 11.1.0-alpha.1.22614.1 -> To Version 11.1.0-alpha.1.23080.2
Copy link
Member

@carlossanlop carlossanlop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lewing
Copy link
Member

lewing commented Feb 9, 2023

@mmitche is there a good way to resolve the feed aggregation here?

@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Feb 9, 2023

Usually, the right thing to do is to select the target branch's side in this case. emsdk flowed into the repo in parallel in a separate PR. If this PR were closed and reopened by Maestro, it would end up correct.

In theory, if we were to invest further in stable dependency flow, we could consider having Maestro 're-evaluate' existing PRs when other dependency flow PRs are merged, and there are merge conflicts. Not quite sure what the downsides would be. /cc @premun @MilenaHristova.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

CI failures are all known and unrelated, so this is good to merge.

Nuget-Migrations: #80619
System.Text.Json nuget package not found: #81914
OleDb: #74488
VisualBasic: #81544
Firefox: #75018
futex_internal.h in Roslyn Generator: #81123

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit a950f86 into release/7.0 Feb 9, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the darc-release/7.0-d1416ddf-641c-4951-ae61-ef26eb7e7ba9 branch February 9, 2023 23:41
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants