-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Static cctor analysis for reflection #84089
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a9b2803
Implements correct data flow analysis around static cctors
vitek-karas ee9ad7d
Introduce a new node for static ctor analysis and move away from eetypes
vitek-karas b7b28c7
Revert unnecessary change
vitek-karas bf53f0d
Remove the new node, it's likely not needed.
vitek-karas e369c8e
Add test for accessing RUC cctor directly
vitek-karas File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will this cause two warnings to be generated? If I understand this correctly, this will generate a warning for reflection access to cctor, and then we get another one when we generate the method body, because this attribute on a cctor is always an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It actually won't - we intentionally ignore the
Requires*
attributes on static cctor for generating warnings (basically relying on the fact that they will produce a warning just due to their presence, without actual callsite).runtime/src/coreclr/tools/aot/ILCompiler.Compiler/Compiler/Dataflow/DiagnosticUtilities.cs
Line 100 in 24fa97a
runtime/src/tools/illink/src/linker/Linker/Annotations.cs
Line 609 in 24fa97a
runtime/src/tools/illink/src/ILLink.RoslynAnalyzer/RequiresISymbolExtensions.cs
Line 60 in 24fa97a
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm adding a test for this behavior as well.