Add back a line that was lost in dotnet/installer migration

[MichalStrehovsky]

dotnet/installer main has had this line since April. This repo doesn't have it.

Cc @dotnet/ilc-contrib

[ViktorHofer]

@MichalStrehovsky should we add tests that use the win-x86 ILCompiler RID to avoid potential regressions in the future?

[MichalStrehovsky]

@MichalStrehovsky should we add tests that use the win-x86 ILCompiler RID to avoid potential regressions in the future?

We have a partial coverage of this list. Full coverage is not possible because we can't cover the freebsd RID (that is there so that the community can build for this if they supply a package) and I'm not sure if we can test things like MUSL since they need a crossrootfs to target.

I think testing for win-x86 would just fall out from these

sdk/test/Microsoft.NET.Publish.Tests/GivenThatWeWantToPublishAnAotApp.cs

Line 12 in 6518391

public class GivenThatWeWantToPublishAnAotApp : SdkTest

but maybe we never run tests with the win-x86 SDK?

But the general answer is that we rely on code reviews as a gate to prevent bugs in this list.

[MiYanni]

Yeah, it looks like it just fell through the cracks when reintegrating the history in the Phase 1 merge PR: https://github.com/dotnet/sdk/pull/38804/files#diff-394534bbcc1d9d8fdf376e8caca2def8ae61560e7f50862ad8106e07072d6ebeR401-R414
The likely reason is because the indentation in this file was fixed on this side (SDK repo) but not on the installer side. Also, I could have just missed this value since this particular include line has a lot of entries.

Here's the original PR in the installer repo for reference: dotnet/installer#19166