You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we try to build a struct using incorrect types, then _pack() is correctly raising an error. However, the foreground thread just hangs when this happens.
This doesn't make sense to me--it's a client side error, so we should be able to fail loudly to the user. The error may be slightly cryptic because all the struct knows is that something is incorrect, it has no idea of the broader context. But at least it'd give the user something to go on...
This behavior may also apply to _unpack().
To reproduce, in _pack(), manually insert a conditional that flips a type:
def _pack(f, value):
try:
if isinstance(value, int):
value = str(value)
return pack(f, value)
except error:
raise ValueError(error)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jeffwidman
changed the title
Failures in struct packing should not hang forever
Failures in struct packing should fail loudly and not hang forever
Dec 8, 2017
jeffwidman
changed the title
Failures in struct packing should fail loudly and not hang forever
Failures in struct packing should fail and not hang forever
Dec 8, 2017
I only tested on the producer. As best I can tell, this hanging is a result of the interaction between threads. So the current version of the consumer, being single-threaded, will not have this problem. However, the addition of the background thread in #1266 may introduce this for the consumer as well... I haven't tested that.
If we try to build a struct using incorrect types, then
_pack()
is correctly raising an error. However, the foreground thread just hangs when this happens.This doesn't make sense to me--it's a client side error, so we should be able to fail loudly to the user. The error may be slightly cryptic because all the struct knows is that something is incorrect, it has no idea of the broader context. But at least it'd give the user something to go on...
This behavior may also apply to
_unpack()
.To reproduce, in
_pack()
, manually insert a conditional that flips a type:See also #1318
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: