METplus Coordinated 5.1.0-beta1 Testing #2039
Replies: 4 comments 3 replies
-
Good evening MET team,
Is enhancement from 1997 in the beta update?
#1997
…On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 5:07 PM jprestop ***@***.***> wrote:
Listed below are summaries of the features, enhancements, and bugfixes
included in the *first* development cycle for each software component of
the *METplus Coordinated 5.1.0 release*. These tables summarize the
status of external acceptance testing for these issues.
For each line in these tables, the External Tester listed should:
1. Test the *development release* to confirm the changes work as
expected in their environment.
2. Document their testing with a comment *on the issue itself*, using
the template provided below.
3. Add a comment to *this Discussion* linking to their issue comment.
Copy/paste the following template into your issue comment:
<h3>Testing Summary</h3>
Date:
Location:
Status (PASS/FAIL):
Description:
The External Tester is set to NA for any issues that do not require
external acceptance testing.
METplus Wrappers Project Board
<https://github.com/orgs/dtcenter/projects/66/views/8>
Status
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL) METplus Issue External Tester Acceptance Testing Comment
Link
OPEN #1977 <#1977>
@GwenChen-NOAA <https://github.com/GwenChen-NOAA> MET Project Board
<https://github.com/orgs/dtcenter/projects/64/views/2> List of
Enhancements
Status
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL) MET Issue External Tester Acceptance Testing Comment Link
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2146 <dtcenter/MET#2146> No
external testing required
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2386 <dtcenter/MET#2386> No
external testing required
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2388 <dtcenter/MET#2388> No
external testing required
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2415 <dtcenter/MET#2415> No
external testing required
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2421 <dtcenter/MET#2421> No
external testing required
OPEN dtcenter/MET#2429 <dtcenter/MET#2429>
@JiayiPeng-NOAA <https://github.com/JiayiPeng-NOAA>
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2461 <dtcenter/MET#2461> No
external testing required
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2469 <dtcenter/MET#2469> No
external testing required List of Bugfixes
See the MET-11.0.1-rc1 Release Testing
<#2042> discussion for
testing of these bugs for the MET-11.0.1 release.
Status
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL) MET Issue External Tester Acceptance Testing Comment Link
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2218 <dtcenter/MET#2218>
@GwenChen-NOAA <https://github.com/GwenChen-NOAA> #2042 (comment)
<#2042 (comment)>
OPEN dtcenter/MET#2380 <dtcenter/MET#2380>
@robdarvell <https://github.com/robdarvell>
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2383 <dtcenter/MET#2383>
@perthsb <https://github.com/perthsb> Partha #2042 (comment)
<#2042 (comment)>,
Julie dtcenter/MET#2383 (comment)
<dtcenter/MET#2383 (comment)>
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2387 <dtcenter/MET#2387> NA No
external testing required
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2389 <dtcenter/MET#2389> NA No
external testing required
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2390 <dtcenter/MET#2390>
@HathewayWill <https://github.com/HathewayWill> #2042 (comment)
<#2042 (comment)>
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2399 <dtcenter/MET#2399>
@malloryprow <https://github.com/malloryprow> #2042 (comment)
<#2042 (comment)>
OPEN dtcenter/MET#2402 <dtcenter/MET#2402> USAF?
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2408 <dtcenter/MET#2408> NA No
external testing required
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2412 <dtcenter/MET#2412>
@GwenChen-NOAA <https://github.com/GwenChen-NOAA> #2042 (comment)
<#2042 (comment)>
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2426 <dtcenter/MET#2426>
@GwenChen-NOAA <https://github.com/GwenChen-NOAA> #2042 (comment)
<#2042 (comment)>
OPEN dtcenter/MET#2428 <dtcenter/MET#2428>
@junmeiban <https://github.com/junmeiban>
OPEN dtcenter/MET#2437 <dtcenter/MET#2437>
@craigr3 <https://github.com/craigr3>
*PASS* dtcenter/MET#2452 <dtcenter/MET#2452>
@Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA <https://github.com/Ho-ChunHuang-NOAA> #2042 (comment)
<#2042 (comment)> METplus
Analysis Project Board
<https://github.com/orgs/dtcenter/projects/68/views/15>
Status
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL) METdataio Issue External Tester Acceptance Testing
Comment Link
OPEN dtcenter/METdataio#176
<dtcenter/METdataio#176>
OPEN dtcenter/METdataio#184
<dtcenter/METdataio#184> NA NA
OPEN dtcenter/METdataio#181
<dtcenter/METdataio#181> ? ?
Status
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL) METcalcpy Issue External Tester Acceptance Testing
Comment Link
OPEN dtcenter/METcalcpy#XXXX
Status
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL) METplotpy Issue External Tester Acceptance Testing
Comment Link
OPEN dtcenter/METplotpy#XXXX
Status
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL) METviewer Issue External Tester Acceptance Testing
Comment Link
OPEN dtcenter/METviewer#XXXX
Status
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL) METexpress Issue External Tester Acceptance Testing
Comment Link
OPEN dtcenter/METexpress#XXXX
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2039>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4FUT5RHPXZTFRSPLL7BB33WZ2AMZANCNFSM6AAAAAAUVR3GGE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
… On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 6:05 PM jprestop ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @HathewayWill <https://github.com/HathewayWill>. Yes, that is listed
as "Bugfix: Fix issues with the met_compile_all.sh script and associated
tar files (#2390 <dtcenter/MET#2390>)." in the Release
Notes
<https://met.readthedocs.io/en/develop/Users_Guide/release-notes.html>
under Bugfixes and was resolved with this pull request
<dtcenter/MET#2404>.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2039 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4FUT5RE2ZYLAB6UJXT7JJLWZ2HDFANCNFSM6AAAAAAUVR3GGE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi @JohnHalleyGotway @georgemccabe @jprestop. Jiayi commented on a closed issue this week, so you may not have seen it. To summarize his comments:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi George,
Thanks for your advice. I changed the setting with
"TC_PAIRS_CONSENSUS1_WRITE_MEMBERS = FALSE".
It works now for my use-case.
The CPU difference between the "write_members = FALSE" and "write_members =
TRUE" is about 8 minutes.
It did save a few minutes by only doing the match job for ensemble mean
track and best track.
Thanks for your support!
Jiayi
…On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 5:55 PM George McCabe ***@***.***> wrote:
I just commented on the closed issue. The METplus config variables should
be in all caps. That likely explains why the settings aren't being read
into the MET config.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2039 (reply in thread)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALRTVNPNGKIOEGDUJGZS4HTW4TMVDANCNFSM6AAAAAAUVR3GGE>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Listed below are summaries of the features, enhancements, and bugfixes included in the first development cycle for each software component of the METplus Coordinated 5.1.0 release. These tables summarize the status of external acceptance testing for these issues.
Please see the METplus 5.1 Existing Builds page to see where the beta1 releases are already installed.
External Testing Instructions
For each line in these tables, the
External Tester
listed should:Copy/paste the following template into your ISSUE COMMENT:
The
External Tester
is set toNA
for any issues that do not require external acceptance testing.METplus Wrappers Project Board
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL)
MET Project Board
List of Enhancements
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL)
List of Bugfixes
See the MET-11.0.1-rc1 Release Testing discussion for testing of these bugs for the MET-11.0.1 release.
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL)
METplus Analysis Project Board
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL)
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL)
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL)
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL)
(OPEN/PASS/FAIL)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions