-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
more winsorizing options? #47
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Can you please create an issue about this where we can discuss this, and then you link this PR to it? That way we will have a written record in issues about what motivated this change. :) Thanks! |
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
we could add select helpers here, too. See |
My deadline for sending out my dissertation is 30/9, so before that I won't have time for anything other than a patch here or there... |
Cool. Marking this as a draft PR then. We can revisit this after #133. |
… based on the MAD
* addresses #177 & #49 & #47 for winsorizing based on the MAD * forgot to push updated documentation * new argument "method", updated NEWS, resolved failed test, #179 * update winsorize.numeric added raw method made the code easier to maintain by modularizing it made doc more explicit about the methods updated examples to visualize the effect update NEWS * minor modifications to docs * removed tidyr from Suggests, replaced `tidyr::pivot_longer` with `datawizard::data_to_long` in vignette * added new tests for new winsorization methods, insight::format_message(), data[] <- lapply... Co-authored-by: RemPsyc <RemPsyc@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Mattan S. Ben-Shachar <matanshm@post.bgu.ac.il>
@mattansb Do you think you will have time to finish this PR for a release in the next few weeks? |
Oh, I totally forgot about this... um, probably not... |
Ok, I close it then |
@IndrajeetPatil Would you be open to one or more of the following while I'm at it:
threshold = c(bottom, top)
?threshold
% observations? Is that weird?