-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 207
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide viewer filter for absent C/C++ translation unit files #597
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
30 changes: 30 additions & 0 deletions
30
...g.eclipse.cdt.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/ui/filters/AbsentTranslationUnitFilter.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | ||
/******************************************************************************* | ||
* Copyright (c) 2023 John Dallaway and others. | ||
* | ||
* This program and the accompanying materials | ||
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License 2.0 | ||
* which accompanies this distribution, and is available at | ||
* https://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0/ | ||
* | ||
* SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 | ||
* | ||
* Contributors: | ||
* John Dallaway - initial implementation (#563) | ||
*******************************************************************************/ | ||
package org.eclipse.cdt.internal.ui.filters; | ||
|
||
import org.eclipse.cdt.core.model.ITranslationUnit; | ||
import org.eclipse.jface.viewers.Viewer; | ||
import org.eclipse.jface.viewers.ViewerFilter; | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* Filters out translation unit source files that are not present locally | ||
*/ | ||
public class AbsentTranslationUnitFilter extends ViewerFilter { | ||
|
||
@Override | ||
public boolean select(Viewer viewer, Object parentElement, Object element) { | ||
return !(element instanceof ITranslationUnit tu) || (null != tu.getResource()) || tu.exists(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jonahgraham how shall we proceed on a final decision regarding default activation state of this filter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If no one objects, I think active by default as the change makes it visible and it is easy enough to restore old behavior. It is hard for users to discover new features, and if we don't activate by default most people won't find it.
If someone objects, then we can have a formal vote on cdt-dev.