-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Throw AssertionError when no master #38432
Merged
DaveCTurner
merged 1 commit into
elastic:master
from
DaveCTurner:2019-02-05-fix-testElectOnlyBetweenMasterNodes
Feb 5, 2019
Merged
Throw AssertionError when no master #38432
DaveCTurner
merged 1 commit into
elastic:master
from
DaveCTurner:2019-02-05-fix-testElectOnlyBetweenMasterNodes
Feb 5, 2019
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Today we throw a fatal `RuntimeException` if an exception occurs in `getMasterName()`, and this includes the case where there is currently no master. However, sometimes we call this method inside an `assertBusy()` in order to allow for a cluster that is in the process of stabilising and electing a master. The trouble is that `assertBusy()` only retries on an `AssertionError` and not on a general `RuntimeException`, so the lack of a master is immediately fatal. This commit fixes the issue by asserting there is a master, triggering a retry if there is not. Fixes elastic#38331
DaveCTurner
added
>test
Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests
v7.0.0
:Distributed Coordination/Cluster Coordination
Cluster formation and cluster state publication, including cluster membership and fault detection.
labels
Feb 5, 2019
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed |
ywelsch
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2019
@elasticmachine please run elasticsearch-ci/packaging-sample |
andrershov
approved these changes
Feb 5, 2019
DaveCTurner
deleted the
2019-02-05-fix-testElectOnlyBetweenMasterNodes
branch
February 5, 2019 17:11
jasontedor
added a commit
to jasontedor/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2019
* master: (23 commits) Lift retention lease expiration to index shard (elastic#38380) Make Ccr recovery file chunk size configurable (elastic#38370) Prevent CCR recovery from missing documents (elastic#38237) re-enables awaitsfixed datemath tests (elastic#38376) Types removal fix FullClusterRestartIT warnings (elastic#38445) Make sure to reject mappings with type _doc when include_type_name is false. (elastic#38270) Updates the grok patterns to be consistent with logstash (elastic#27181) Ignore type-removal warnings in XPackRestTestHelper (elastic#38431) testHlrcFromXContent() should respect assertToXContentEquivalence() (elastic#38232) add basic REST test for geohash_grid (elastic#37996) Remove DiscoveryPlugin#getDiscoveryTypes (elastic#38414) Fix the clock resolution to millis in GetWatchResponseTests (elastic#38405) Throw AssertionError when no master (elastic#38432) `if_seq_no` and `if_primary_term` parameters aren't wired correctly in REST Client's CRUD API (elastic#38411) Enable CronEvalToolTest.testEnsureDateIsShownInRootLocale (elastic#38394) Fix failures in BulkProcessorIT#testGlobalParametersAndBulkProcessor. (elastic#38129) SQL: Implement CURRENT_DATE (elastic#38175) Mute testReadRequestsReturnLatestMappingVersion (elastic#38438) [ML] Report index unavailable instead of waiting for lazy node (elastic#38423) Update Rollup Caps to allow unknown fields (elastic#38339) ...
DaveCTurner
added a commit
to DaveCTurner/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2019
Today in `SpecificMasterNodesIT` we assert the name of the master and throw a NPE if there is no master. This doesn't work within an `assertBusy()` because the NPE triggers an immediate failure rather than the desired retry. This commit addresses this by first asserting that the master is non-null. Fixes elastic#38331 Relates elastic#38432
DaveCTurner
added a commit
to DaveCTurner/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 23, 2019
Today the `TransportClusterStateAction` ignores the state passed by the `TransportMasterNodeAction` and obtains its state from the cluster applier. This might be inconsistent, showing a different node as the master or maybe even having no master. This change adjusts the action to use the passed-in state directly, and adds tests showing that the state returned is consistent with our expectations even if there is a concurrent master failover. Fixes elastic#38331 Relates elastic#38432
pull bot
pushed a commit
to fabriziofortino/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2019
Today the `TransportClusterStateAction` ignores the state passed by the `TransportMasterNodeAction` and obtains its state from the cluster applier. This might be inconsistent, showing a different node as the master or maybe even having no master. This change adjusts the action to use the passed-in state directly, and adds tests showing that the state returned is consistent with our expectations even if there is a concurrent master failover. Fixes elastic#38331 Relates elastic#38432
DaveCTurner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2019
Today the `TransportClusterStateAction` ignores the state passed by the `TransportMasterNodeAction` and obtains its state from the cluster applier. This might be inconsistent, showing a different node as the master or maybe even having no master. This change adjusts the action to use the passed-in state directly, and adds tests showing that the state returned is consistent with our expectations even if there is a concurrent master failover. Fixes #38331 Relates #38432
gurkankaymak
pushed a commit
to gurkankaymak/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
May 27, 2019
Today the `TransportClusterStateAction` ignores the state passed by the `TransportMasterNodeAction` and obtains its state from the cluster applier. This might be inconsistent, showing a different node as the master or maybe even having no master. This change adjusts the action to use the passed-in state directly, and adds tests showing that the state returned is consistent with our expectations even if there is a concurrent master failover. Fixes elastic#38331 Relates elastic#38432
DaveCTurner
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2019
Today the `TransportClusterStateAction` ignores the state passed by the `TransportMasterNodeAction` and obtains its state from the cluster applier. This might be inconsistent, showing a different node as the master or maybe even having no master. This change adjusts the action to use the passed-in state directly, and adds tests showing that the state returned is consistent with our expectations even if there is a concurrent master failover. Fixes #38331 Relates #38432
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
:Distributed Coordination/Cluster Coordination
Cluster formation and cluster state publication, including cluster membership and fault detection.
>test
Issues or PRs that are addressing/adding tests
v7.0.0-beta1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Today we throw a fatal
RuntimeException
if an exception occurs ingetMasterName()
, and this includes the case where there is currently nomaster. However, sometimes we call this method inside an
assertBusy()
inorder to allow for a cluster that is in the process of stabilising and electing
a master. The trouble is that
assertBusy()
only retries on anAssertionError
and not on a generalRuntimeException
, so the lack of amaster is immediately fatal.
This commit fixes the issue by asserting there is a master, triggering a retry
if there is not.
Fixes #38331.