-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ML] Include the "properties" layer in find_file_structure mappings #62158
Merged
droberts195
merged 2 commits into
elastic:master
from
droberts195:add_properties_to_find_file_structure
Sep 9, 2020
Merged
[ML] Include the "properties" layer in find_file_structure mappings #62158
droberts195
merged 2 commits into
elastic:master
from
droberts195:add_properties_to_find_file_structure
Sep 9, 2020
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the mappings format of the create index endpoint - the "properties" layer was missing. The reason for omitting it initially was that the assumption was that the find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very simple mappings without any nested objects. However, this will not be true in the future, as we will improve mappings detection for complex JSON objects. As a first step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer to the standard format. This is a small building block towards fixing elastic#55616
Pinging @elastic/ml-core (:ml) |
benwtrent
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2020
The UI side change is elastic/kibana#77035. |
droberts195
added a commit
to elastic/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2020
…77035) This is the UI side companion for elastic/elasticsearch#62158 Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the mappings format of the create index endpoint - the "properties" layer was missing. The reason for omitting it initially was that the assumption was that the find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very simple mappings without any nested objects. However, this will not be true in the future, as we will improve mappings detection for complex JSON objects. As a first step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer to the standard format.
droberts195
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2020
…62158) Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the mappings format of the create index endpoint - the "properties" layer was missing. The reason for omitting it initially was that the assumption was that the find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very simple mappings without any nested objects. However, this will not be true in the future, as we will improve mappings detection for complex JSON objects. As a first step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer to the standard format. This is a small building block towards fixing #55616
droberts195
added a commit
to elastic/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2020
…77035) (#77142) This is the UI side companion for elastic/elasticsearch#62158 Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the mappings format of the create index endpoint - the "properties" layer was missing. The reason for omitting it initially was that the assumption was that the find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very simple mappings without any nested objects. However, this will not be true in the future, as we will improve mappings detection for complex JSON objects. As a first step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer to the standard format.
1 task
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the
find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the
mappings format of the create index endpoint - the
"properties" layer was missing. The reason for omitting
it initially was that the assumption was that the
find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very
simple mappings without any nested objects. However,
this will not be true in the future, as we will improve
mappings detection for complex JSON objects. As a first
step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer
to the standard format.
This is a small building block towards fixing #55616