Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ML] Include the "properties" layer in find_file_structure mappings #62158

Merged

Conversation

droberts195
Copy link
Contributor

Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the
find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the
mappings format of the create index endpoint - the
"properties" layer was missing. The reason for omitting
it initially was that the assumption was that the
find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very
simple mappings without any nested objects. However,
this will not be true in the future, as we will improve
mappings detection for complex JSON objects. As a first
step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer
to the standard format.

This is a small building block towards fixing #55616

Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the
find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the
mappings format of the create index endpoint - the
"properties" layer was missing.  The reason for omitting
it initially was that the assumption was that the
find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very
simple mappings without any nested objects.  However,
this will not be true in the future, as we will improve
mappings detection for complex JSON objects.  As a first
step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer
to the standard format.

This is a small building block towards fixing elastic#55616
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/ml-core (:ml)

@droberts195
Copy link
Contributor Author

The UI side change is elastic/kibana#77035.

@droberts195 droberts195 merged commit 6008a74 into elastic:master Sep 9, 2020
@droberts195 droberts195 deleted the add_properties_to_find_file_structure branch September 9, 2020 15:29
droberts195 added a commit to elastic/kibana that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2020
…77035)

This is the UI side companion for elastic/elasticsearch#62158

Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the
find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the
mappings format of the create index endpoint - the
"properties" layer was missing. The reason for omitting
it initially was that the assumption was that the
find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very
simple mappings without any nested objects. However,
this will not be true in the future, as we will improve
mappings detection for complex JSON objects. As a first
step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer
to the standard format.
droberts195 added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2020
…62158)

Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the
find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the
mappings format of the create index endpoint - the
"properties" layer was missing.  The reason for omitting
it initially was that the assumption was that the
find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very
simple mappings without any nested objects.  However,
this will not be true in the future, as we will improve
mappings detection for complex JSON objects.  As a first
step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer
to the standard format.

This is a small building block towards fixing #55616
droberts195 added a commit to elastic/kibana that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2020
…77035) (#77142)

This is the UI side companion for elastic/elasticsearch#62158

Previously the "mappings" field of the response from the
find_file_structure endpoint was not a drop-in for the
mappings format of the create index endpoint - the
"properties" layer was missing. The reason for omitting
it initially was that the assumption was that the
find_file_structure endpoint would only ever return very
simple mappings without any nested objects. However,
this will not be true in the future, as we will improve
mappings detection for complex JSON objects. As a first
step it makes sense to move the returned mappings closer
to the standard format.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants