Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Index Patterns Field Formatter] Added human readable precise formatter for duration #100540

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Jun 1, 2021

Conversation

shahzad31
Copy link
Contributor

@shahzad31 shahzad31 commented May 25, 2021

Summary

Closes #94641
Closes #11706

Added a new field formatter in index patterns for duration field to be used in observability use cases

Need to fix for elastic/uptime#327

Also added a use short suffix check box to use short suffix strings in units.

Also aded an option whether to include space between suffix /value

This is how it works on sample data

image

@shahzad31 shahzad31 changed the title added dynamic formatter for duration [Index Patterns Field Formatter] Added dynamic formatter for duration May 25, 2021
@shahzad31 shahzad31 marked this pull request as ready for review May 25, 2021 11:18
@shahzad31 shahzad31 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 25, 2021 11:18
@shahzad31 shahzad31 self-assigned this May 25, 2021
@shahzad31 shahzad31 added release_note:enhancement v7.14.0 v8.0.0 Team:Uptime - DEPRECATED Synthetics & RUM sub-team of Application Observability labels May 25, 2021
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/uptime (Team:uptime)

@shahzad31 shahzad31 requested a review from formgeist May 25, 2021 12:30
@mattkime
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm, reaching out to @wylieconlon to see if he has any thoughts on this before I give my 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@wylieconlon wylieconlon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @shahzad31 thanks for taking this on! The concept is pretty much exactly what users are requesting, and here's my feedback after testing it:

  • Values less than 1 are bugged in this formatter, so just to take one example: with nanoseconds input, 123 nanoseconds should either display as 123 ns, 1.23 µs, or 0.000123 ms- but currently displays 0. Same with negative values. I would expect that for values less than 1, the suffix would be chosen based on the number of decimal places that are displayed. So if I choose to display 6 decimal places I would see 0.000123 ms, but if I choose 0 decimal places it should be 123 ns.
  • Suffix should be required for this new formatter, same as the human readable
  • The name "dynamic" is not very clear. I suggest renaming "human readable" -> approximate, and "dynamic" -> precise
  • I suggest moving this new format option to be near the top of the list, not the bottom
  • The value 0 should get a suffix too, as 0 ms is still a unit.
  • Decimal places aren't affecting the value 0, so if I have 2 decimals I want to see 0.00 ms
  • The suffixes you've chosen are inconsistent lengths and case, for example you have d, sec, and Yr

It would be great if the unit tests would test multiple cases per format setting, so that you can test the whole range of formats from negative, less than 1, very large, etc.

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-app-services (Team:AppServices)

@shahzad31
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @shahzad31 thanks for taking this on! The concept is pretty much exactly what users are requesting, and here's my feedback after testing it:

  • Values less than 1 are bugged in this formatter, so just to take one example: with nanoseconds input, 123 nanoseconds should either display as 123 ns, 1.23 µs, or 0.000123 ms- but currently displays 0. Same with negative values. I would expect that for values less than 1, the suffix would be chosen based on the number of decimal places that are displayed. So if I choose to display 6 decimal places I would see 0.000123 ms, but if I choose 0 decimal places it should be 123 ns.

i have addressed this

  • Suffix should be required for this new formatter, same as the human readable

fixed as well

  • The value 0 should get a suffix too, as 0 ms is still a unit.

Fixed

  • Decimal places aren't affecting the value 0, so if I have 2 decimals I want to see 0.00 ms

Fixed

  • The suffixes you've chosen are inconsistent lengths and case, for example you have d, sec, and Yr

I have tried improving this

It would be great if the unit tests would test multiple cases per format setting, so that you can test the whole range of formats from negative, less than 1, very large, etc.

added few more tests

@shahzad31
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shahzad31 It looks like you've introduced a new bug in the UI, which is that the form options for the precise format are disabled. Also, I would have expected that the suffix option is not shown when using the precise format.

@wylieconlon i fixed the bug, in case of human readable precise, show suffix isn't shown. Only the options to use short suffix is shown. Since that's still applicable.

@mattkime mattkime requested a review from Dosant May 27, 2021 16:11
Copy link
Contributor

@wylieconlon wylieconlon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! This is great, users will be happy to see this.

Copy link
Contributor

@mattkime mattkime left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes lgtm and work well

@shahzad31
Copy link
Contributor Author

@elasticmachine merge upstream

Copy link
Contributor

@Dosant Dosant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. If I understood correctly then the old Human readable should become Human-readable approximate? But it looks like that when I check out this pr old fields that were Human readable now use Human-readable precise, hence their format in apps change.
    Is this behavior expected? I'd assume old fields should follow old formatting unless changed explicitly by a user?

  2. I noticed some inconsistencies between formatting when precise vs approximate are used:
    For example, see hours vs Hours? Would it be difficult to improve? Looks like this was also the case before for other formatting options. Please ignore

Screen Shot 2021-05-31 at 14 25 52
Screen Shot 2021-05-31 at 14 41 40

  1. Also per the images above, looks like precise returns an empty string when duration is 0 where approximate (old behavior) returns a few seconds. I would agree that the old behavior is incorrect, but also probably empty string should return something different (e.g. 0.00 seonds maybe?)? Or is this expected?

text: i18n.translate('data.fieldFormats.duration.outputFormats.humanize', {
defaultMessage: 'Human Readable',
text: i18n.translate('data.fieldFormats.duration.outputFormats.humanize.precise', {
defaultMessage: 'Human Readable precise',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit copy: I think casing should be consistent here. It should either be Human Readable Precise or Human readable precise.

As I typing it out autocorrect actually suggesting me that this needs a hyphen. Then how about:

Human-readable (precise) and Human-readable (approximate) ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I liked the suggestions. Done

@shahzad31
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Dosant so weirdly in case of default output format it doesn't set the output format value in the saved object, it goes as empty. This is why the behavior you are seeing. Will have to find some solution for this. Or otherwise i will leave the default output format as Human readable approx.

  1. If I understood correctly then the old Human readable should become Human-readable approximate? But it looks like that when I check out this pr old fields that were Human readable now use Human-readable precise, hence their format in apps change.
    Is this behavior expected? I'd assume old fields should follow old formatting unless changed explicitly by a user?

@shahzad31
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Dosant i have reverted the default format to Human-readable approximate to avoid complexities. We can tackle that in a follow up if needs be.

@shahzad31 shahzad31 requested a review from Dosant June 1, 2021 07:41
Copy link
Contributor

@Dosant Dosant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Retested recent changes. LGTM 👍

@shahzad31 shahzad31 added the auto-backport Deprecated - use backport:version if exact versions are needed label Jun 1, 2021
@shahzad31 shahzad31 merged commit 4aa3920 into elastic:master Jun 1, 2021
@shahzad31 shahzad31 deleted the new-field-format branch June 1, 2021 12:05
kibanamachine added a commit to kibanamachine/kibana that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2021
…er for duration (elastic#100540)

Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Backport successful

Status Branch Result
7.x

This backport PR will be merged automatically after passing CI.

kibanamachine added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2021
…er for duration (#100540) (#101046)

Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>

Co-authored-by: Shahzad <shahzad.muhammad@elastic.co>
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky


Test Failures

Kibana Pipeline / general / X-Pack API Integration Tests.x-pack/test/api_integration/apis/management/index_management/indices·js.apis management index management indices reload (not on Cloud) should list all the indices with the expected properties and data enrichers

Link to Jenkins

Standard Out

Failed Tests Reporter:
  - Test has failed 6 times on tracked branches: https://github.com/elastic/kibana/issues/90565

[00:00:00]       │
[00:00:00]         └-: apis
[00:00:00]           └-> "before all" hook in "apis"
[00:05:45]           └-: management
[00:05:45]             └-> "before all" hook in "management"
[00:06:03]             └-: index management
[00:06:03]               └-> "before all" hook in "index management"
[00:06:03]               └-: indices
[00:06:03]                 └-> "before all" hook in "indices"
[00:06:05]                 └-: reload
[00:06:05]                   └-> "before all" hook for "should allow reloading only certain indices"
[00:06:05]                   └-> should allow reloading only certain indices
[00:06:05]                     └-> "before each" hook: global before each for "should allow reloading only certain indices"
[00:06:05]                     │ info [o.e.c.m.MetadataCreateIndexService] [kibana-ci-immutable-ubuntu-18-tests-xxl-1622549862751015791] [gsegnlzmcvmmjdwatl-1622552779684] creating index, cause [api], templates [], shards [1]/[1]
[00:06:05]                     └- ✓ pass  (67ms) "apis management index management indices reload should allow reloading only certain indices"
[00:06:05]                   └-: (not on Cloud)
[00:06:05]                     └-> "before all" hook for "should list all the indices with the expected properties and data enrichers"
[00:06:05]                     └-> should list all the indices with the expected properties and data enrichers
[00:06:05]                       └-> "before each" hook: global before each for "should list all the indices with the expected properties and data enrichers"
[00:06:05]                       └- ✖ fail: apis management index management indices reload (not on Cloud) should list all the indices with the expected properties and data enrichers
[00:06:05]                       │       Error: expected [ 'aliases',
[00:06:05]                       │   'data_stream',
[00:06:05]                       │   'documents',
[00:06:05]                       │   'health',
[00:06:05]                       │   'hidden',
[00:06:05]                       │   'ilm',
[00:06:05]                       │   'isFollowerIndex',
[00:06:05]                       │   'isFrozen',
[00:06:05]                       │   'isRollupIndex',
[00:06:05]                       │   'name',
[00:06:05]                       │   'primary',
[00:06:05]                       │   'replica',
[00:06:05]                       │   'size',
[00:06:05]                       │   'status',
[00:06:05]                       │   'uuid' ] to sort of equal [ 'aliases',
[00:06:05]                       │   'documents',
[00:06:05]                       │   'health',
[00:06:05]                       │   'hidden',
[00:06:05]                       │   'ilm',
[00:06:05]                       │   'isFollowerIndex',
[00:06:05]                       │   'isFrozen',
[00:06:05]                       │   'isRollupIndex',
[00:06:05]                       │   'name',
[00:06:05]                       │   'primary',
[00:06:05]                       │   'replica',
[00:06:05]                       │   'size',
[00:06:05]                       │   'status',
[00:06:05]                       │   'uuid' ]
[00:06:05]                       │       + expected - actual
[00:06:05]                       │ 
[00:06:05]                       │        [
[00:06:05]                       │          "aliases"
[00:06:05]                       │       -  "data_stream"
[00:06:05]                       │          "documents"
[00:06:05]                       │          "health"
[00:06:05]                       │          "hidden"
[00:06:05]                       │          "ilm"
[00:06:05]                       │       
[00:06:05]                       │       at Assertion.assert (/dev/shm/workspace/parallel/8/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:100:11)
[00:06:05]                       │       at Assertion.eql (/dev/shm/workspace/parallel/8/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:244:8)
[00:06:05]                       │       at Context.<anonymous> (test/api_integration/apis/management/index_management/indices.js:237:41)
[00:06:05]                       │       at Object.apply (/dev/shm/workspace/parallel/8/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/test/src/functional_test_runner/lib/mocha/wrap_function.js:73:16)
[00:06:05]                       │ 
[00:06:05]                       │ 

Stack Trace

Error: expected [ 'aliases',
  'data_stream',
  'documents',
  'health',
  'hidden',
  'ilm',
  'isFollowerIndex',
  'isFrozen',
  'isRollupIndex',
  'name',
  'primary',
  'replica',
  'size',
  'status',
  'uuid' ] to sort of equal [ 'aliases',
  'documents',
  'health',
  'hidden',
  'ilm',
  'isFollowerIndex',
  'isFrozen',
  'isRollupIndex',
  'name',
  'primary',
  'replica',
  'size',
  'status',
  'uuid' ]
    at Assertion.assert (/dev/shm/workspace/parallel/8/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:100:11)
    at Assertion.eql (/dev/shm/workspace/parallel/8/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/expect/expect.js:244:8)
    at Context.<anonymous> (test/api_integration/apis/management/index_management/indices.js:237:41)
    at Object.apply (/dev/shm/workspace/parallel/8/kibana/node_modules/@kbn/test/src/functional_test_runner/lib/mocha/wrap_function.js:73:16) {
  actual: '[\n' +
    '  "aliases"\n' +
    '  "data_stream"\n' +
    '  "documents"\n' +
    '  "health"\n' +
    '  "hidden"\n' +
    '  "ilm"\n' +
    '  "isFollowerIndex"\n' +
    '  "isFrozen"\n' +
    '  "isRollupIndex"\n' +
    '  "name"\n' +
    '  "primary"\n' +
    '  "replica"\n' +
    '  "size"\n' +
    '  "status"\n' +
    '  "uuid"\n' +
    ']',
  expected: '[\n' +
    '  "aliases"\n' +
    '  "documents"\n' +
    '  "health"\n' +
    '  "hidden"\n' +
    '  "ilm"\n' +
    '  "isFollowerIndex"\n' +
    '  "isFrozen"\n' +
    '  "isRollupIndex"\n' +
    '  "name"\n' +
    '  "primary"\n' +
    '  "replica"\n' +
    '  "size"\n' +
    '  "status"\n' +
    '  "uuid"\n' +
    ']',
  showDiff: true
}

Metrics [docs]

Public APIs missing comments

Total count of every public API that lacks a comment. Target amount is 0. Run node scripts/build_api_docs --plugin [yourplugin] --stats comments for more detailed information.

id before after diff
data 3223 3224 +1

Page load bundle

Size of the bundles that are downloaded on every page load. Target size is below 100kb

id before after diff
data 817.4KB 820.8KB +3.4KB
indexPatternFieldEditor 81.8KB 83.1KB +1.3KB
total +4.7KB
Unknown metric groups

API count

id before after diff
data 3768 3769 +1

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

cc @shahzad31

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-backport Deprecated - use backport:version if exact versions are needed Feature:FieldFormatters release_note:enhancement Team:Uptime - DEPRECATED Synthetics & RUM sub-team of Application Observability v7.14.0 v8.0.0
Projects
None yet
7 participants