Spec fallback: use integration type by default #1818
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @mtojek? 🙏
|
mergify
bot
added
the
backport-skip
|
A documentation preview will be available soon: |
jsoriano
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2022
szabosteve
approved these changes
Apr 26, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes the issue reported by CI build after we merged this PR.
In general, we didn't expect that there is code accessing those files directly. We should rather migrate this doc to the package-spec repo to prevent such failures in the future.
The reason why we introduced this change to package-spec is that we're working on supporting another type.