Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.x] Creates CSPM privileges standalone page (backport #6269) #6318

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Fixes #6261 — Creates a standalone page that describes the privileges that grant different levels of access to CSPM features. Removes the lists of privileges from the requirements sections of each of the CSPM get started guides for AWS, GCP, and Azure, and replaces them with a link to the new page, which includes more details.

Preview: CSPM privilege requirements ESS, Serverless


This is an automatic backport of pull request #6269 done by Mergify.

* Creates CSPM privileges standalone page

* ports updates to serverless

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: natasha-moore-elastic <137783811+natasha-moore-elastic@users.noreply.github.com>

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Nastasha Solomon <79124755+nastasha-solomon@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: natasha-moore-elastic <137783811+natasha-moore-elastic@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Nastasha Solomon <79124755+nastasha-solomon@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 51b58c2)

# Conflicts:
#	docs/serverless/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started-azure.asciidoc
#	docs/serverless/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started-gcp.asciidoc
#	docs/serverless/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started.asciidoc
#	docs/serverless/index.asciidoc
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2024 17:57
Copy link
Contributor Author

mergify bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Cherry-pick of 51b58c2 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/8.x/pr-6269
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/8.x'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 51b58c2f.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   docs/cloud-native-security/cloud-native-security-index.asciidoc
	modified:   docs/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started-aws.asciidoc
	modified:   docs/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started-azure.asciidoc
	modified:   docs/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started-gcp.asciidoc
	new file:   docs/cloud-native-security/cspm-permissions.asciidoc
	new file:   docs/serverless/cloud-native-security/cspm-permissions.asciidoc

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	deleted by us:   docs/serverless/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started-azure.asciidoc
	deleted by us:   docs/serverless/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started-gcp.asciidoc
	deleted by us:   docs/serverless/cloud-native-security/cspm-get-started.asciidoc
	deleted by us:   docs/serverless/index.asciidoc

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

Copy link

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@benironside benironside merged commit 911da2d into 8.x Dec 13, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant