You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Full link command and output with -v appended:
N/A
We build our product with -s ASSERTIONS=1 in some circumstances because some of the assertions are valuable.
However, when using pthreads, these lines log a scary message to the console whenever emscripten_unwind_to_js_event_loop is used. But this is not an error, it's just the expected way that function is supposed to work. Is it reasonable to just remove the error? If it's used for some tests in Emscripten, is there some other way to validate the expected behavior?
err('Pthread 0x'+Module['_pthread_self']().toString(16)+' completed its main entry point with an `unwind`, keeping the worker alive for asynchronous operation.');
#endif
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Please include the following in your bug report:
Version of emscripten/emsdk:
Failing command line in full:
N/A
Full link command and output with
-v
appended:N/A
We build our product with
-s ASSERTIONS=1
in some circumstances because some of the assertions are valuable.However, when using pthreads, these lines log a scary message to the console whenever
emscripten_unwind_to_js_event_loop
is used. But this is not an error, it's just the expected way that function is supposed to work. Is it reasonable to just remove the error? If it's used for some tests in Emscripten, is there some other way to validate the expected behavior?emscripten/src/worker.js
Lines 252 to 254 in 13b1f81
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: