Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix ISE when creating fuel tanks (#20) #21

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2023
Merged

Fix ISE when creating fuel tanks (#20) #21

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2023

Conversation

enjinabner
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@enjinabner enjinabner self-assigned this Nov 9, 2023
@enjinabner enjinabner changed the base branch from master to release November 9, 2023 10:41
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2023

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: This PR addresses an internal server error (ISE) that was occurring when creating fuel tanks. It includes changes to handle null values and zero values in the code and adds a new test case to verify the fix.
  • 📝 PR summary: The PR fixes an issue where an internal server error was thrown when creating fuel tanks. This was done by adding null checks and handling for zero values in the code. Additionally, a new test case was added to ensure that fuel tanks can be created with zero values.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 2, the PR is relatively small and straightforward. It includes changes to handle null and zero values and adds a new test case.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and addresses the issue at hand effectively. The addition of a new test case to handle zero values is a good practice. However, it would be beneficial to add more context in the PR description to provide more information about the issue and how the changes fix it.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 9, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (38b671b) 97.18% compared to head (70b83c7) 97.18%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             release      #21   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      97.18%   97.18%           
  Complexity       294      294           
==========================================
  Files             62       62           
  Lines           1776     1776           
==========================================
  Hits            1726     1726           
  Misses            50       50           
Files Coverage Δ
src/GraphQL/Mutations/CreateFuelTankMutation.php 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...c/Services/Blockchain/Implemetations/Substrate.php 96.72% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@enjinabner enjinabner merged commit 805ba2b into release Nov 9, 2023
@enjinabner enjinabner deleted the hotfix branch November 9, 2023 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants