Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement RemoteProcessImpl in terms of PerformNighthawkBenchmark() #548

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2020

Conversation

oschaaf
Copy link
Member

@oschaaf oschaaf commented Sep 22, 2020

Drop duplicated code, use the newer code that has better test
coverage plus handling for when multiple results would be received.
This also makes the newer code run with the pre-existing end-to-end testing
for this.

Fixes #496

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf oschaaf@we-amp.com

Drop duplicated code, use the newer code that has better test
coverage plus handling for when multiple results would be received.

Fixes envoyproxy#496

Signed-off-by: Otto van der Schaaf <oschaaf@we-amp.com>
@oschaaf oschaaf added the waiting-for-review A PR waiting for a review. label Sep 22, 2020
@oschaaf
Copy link
Member Author

oschaaf commented Sep 22, 2020

/cc @eric846

@mum4k mum4k merged commit 8ed1f68 into envoyproxy:master Sep 22, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
waiting-for-review A PR waiting for a review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Dedupe code between PerformNighthawkBenchmark and RemoteProcessImpl::run
2 participants