Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attachment points should be within R-Group brackets #197

Closed
ElenaKlepova opened this issue Dec 21, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2888
Closed

Attachment points should be within R-Group brackets #197

ElenaKlepova opened this issue Dec 21, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #2888

Comments

@ElenaKlepova
Copy link

Description:
When attachment points are attached to a structure that is a R-Group member, the attachment points are beyond the R-Group brackets.

Steps to reproduce:

  1. Create a structure.
  2. Make the structure a R-Group member using R-Group Fragment Tool.
  3. Attach attachment points to the structure using Attachment Point Tool.

Actual result:
Attachment points are beyond R-Group brackets.
2020-12-21_17h17_11

Expected result:
Attachment points are within R-Group brackets.

@Zhirnoff
Copy link
Collaborator

After we switched to attachment point visualization to IUPAC style, attachment points began to protrude more than before beyond the brackets of the R-group and overlap some elements of the structure. Attachment points must be completely closed by brackets and they must not protrude beyond their borders.
2023-06-20_18h23_36
2023-06-20_18h24_45

@Nitvex Nitvex assigned StarlaStarla and unassigned Nitvex Jul 5, 2023
@StarlaStarla StarlaStarla linked a pull request Jul 7, 2023 that will close this issue
7 tasks
StarlaStarla added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2023
StarlaStarla added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2023
rrodionov91 added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 18, 2023
…thin-r-group-brackets

#197 - Attachment points should be within R-Group brackets
@StarlaStarla StarlaStarla linked a pull request Jul 19, 2023 that will close this issue
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment