Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove std cutoff filtering in HISTORY_OBSERVATION #8498

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

oyvindeide
Copy link
Collaborator

@oyvindeide oyvindeide commented Aug 16, 2024

Issue
Resolves #8353

  • PR title captures the intent of the changes, and is fitting for release notes.
  • Added appropriate release note label
  • Commit history is consistent and clean, in line with the contribution guidelines.
  • Make sure tests pass locally (after every commit!)

When applicable

  • When there are user facing changes: Updated documentation
  • New behavior or changes to existing untested code: Ensured that unit tests are added (See Ground Rules).
  • Large PR: Prepare changes in small commits for more convenient review
  • Bug fix: Add regression test for the bug
  • Bug fix: Create Backport PR to latest release

@oyvindeide oyvindeide self-assigned this Aug 16, 2024
@oyvindeide oyvindeide added the release-notes:improvement Automatically categorise as improvement in release notes label Aug 16, 2024
@oyvindeide oyvindeide force-pushed the remove_std_cutoff branch 2 times, most recently from 0dad1ac to 01898dc Compare August 16, 2024 11:11
Not sure this was intended, as this property is meant to filter
out ensembles based on the ensemble std, i.e. from the responses.

Additionally HISTORY_OBSERVATION is not really recommended, and
by filtering out earlier scaling factors are not applied, which
could impact the outcome.
Copy link
Collaborator

@sondreso sondreso left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Could you change the PR title to mention something about HISTORY_OBSERVATION

@oyvindeide oyvindeide changed the title Remove std cutoff Remove std cutoff filtering in HISTORY_OBSERVATION Aug 16, 2024
@oyvindeide oyvindeide merged commit 2d73055 into equinor:main Aug 16, 2024
35 checks passed
@oyvindeide oyvindeide deleted the remove_std_cutoff branch August 16, 2024 12:04
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.63%. Comparing base (5b268b4) to head (2cdfecd).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8498      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.65%   90.63%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         344      344              
  Lines       20969    20965       -4     
==========================================
- Hits        19009    19002       -7     
- Misses       1960     1963       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
gui-tests 75.93% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
integration-tests 53.90% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unit-tests 68.61% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release-notes:improvement Automatically categorise as improvement in release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should STD_CUTOFF be used to discard history observations?
3 participants