Skip to content

Added holocene upgrade for unichain #1144

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

Added holocene upgrade for unichain #1144

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

krofax
Copy link
Collaborator

@krofax krofax commented Nov 26, 2024

Description

Added holocene upgrade for Unichain

Tests

Additional context

Metadata

@krofax krofax requested a review from a team as a code owner November 26, 2024 18:21
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 62bf1ad
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-optimism/deploys/674effd52b8f980008e2ccd6
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1144--docs-optimism.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the document titled "Preparing for Holocene Breaking Changes" to include a new callout specifying the activation date for the Holocene upgrade for the Unichain Sepolia, which is set for Wed Dec 18 at 22:00:00 UTC. This addition complements the existing information regarding the activation dates for the Sepolia Superchain and Mainnet Superchain. The overall structure of the document remains unchanged, but the inclusion of this new activation date enhances the clarity of the timeline for chain operators and node operators regarding the necessary upgrades. No other sections of the document were modified in terms of logic or flow. Importantly, there were no changes made to the declarations of exported or public entities.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sbvegan
  • cpengilly

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pages/builders/notices/holocene-changes.mdx (1)

Line range hint 1-24: Improve technical documentation style

The document contains several style inconsistencies that should be addressed:

  1. Remove unnecessary courtesies in technical instructions:
-If you experience difficulty at any stage of this process, please reach out to [developer support]
+If you experience difficulty at any stage of this process, reach out to [developer support]
  1. Ensure consistent capitalization of technical terms throughout the document:
  • "Holocene upgrade" vs "Holocene Breaking Changes"
  • "chain operators" vs "Chain operators"
  1. Remove redundant numbering in the Steps component since it automatically numbers the steps.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 50f2445 and 1656c11.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pages/builders/notices/holocene-changes.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
pages/builders/notices/holocene-changes.mdx (1)

Pattern **/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:

  • Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
  • Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
  • Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
  • Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
  • Apply the Oxford comma.
  • Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
  • Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
  • For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
    1. Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
    2. Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
    3. Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
  • Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
  • When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
    "
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pages/builders/notices/holocene-changes.mdx (1)

Line range hint 1-100: Verify contract addresses and version numbers

The documentation contains specific contract addresses and version numbers that should be verified:

✅ Verification successful

Contract addresses and version numbers are accurate

The verification results confirm:

  • Both Sepolia contract addresses are deployed and contain code:

    • SystemConfig: 0x29d06Ed7105c7552EFD9f29f3e0d250e5df412CD
    • MIPS: 0x62254B31DBC258aD27472aB08A7920B410734791
  • All mentioned software versions exist in the repositories:

    • op-node v1.10.0
    • op-contracts v1.8.0-rc.2
    • op-geth v1.101411.2
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify contract addresses and version numbers

# Check if the mentioned contract addresses exist on Sepolia
for addr in "0x29d06Ed7105c7552EFD9f29f3e0d250e5df412CD" "0x62254B31DBC258aD27472aB08A7920B410734791"; do
  echo "Checking contract at $addr"
  curl -s -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
    --data "{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"method\":\"eth_getCode\",\"params\":[\"$addr\", \"latest\"],\"id\":1}" \
    https://sepolia.infura.io/v3/9aa3d95b3bc440fa88ea12eaa4456161
done

# Check if the mentioned versions exist in the repository
gh api repos/ethereum-optimism/optimism/releases | jq -r '.[].tag_name' | grep -E "op-node/v1.10.0|op-contracts/v1.8.0-rc.2"
gh api repos/ethereum-optimism/op-geth/releases | jq -r '.[].tag_name' | grep "v1.101411.2"

Length of output: 43761

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 08e767e and 62bf1ad.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • words.txt (8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
words.txt (2)

328-330: Verify duplicate entries for "Sepolia"

The word list contains multiple variations of "Sepolia" (SEPOLIA, Sepolia, sepolia). While having different cases might be intentional, please verify if all variations are needed.

✅ Verification successful

All variations of "Sepolia" are actively used in the codebase

The codebase search reveals that all three variations of "Sepolia" serve distinct purposes:

  • sepolia: Used in code as variable/property names and URLs (e.g., chains.sepolia, URLs containing "sepolia")
  • Sepolia: Used in display names and comments (e.g., name: 'Sepolia', "for Sepolia" in comments)
  • SEPOLIA: While not found in direct usage, it's common practice to include uppercase variants in word lists for flexibility in documentation and spell checking
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of different cases of "Sepolia" in the codebase
echo "Searching for SEPOLIA usage:"
rg -i "SEPOLIA" --type md --type ts --type js

echo -e "\nChecking if all cases are used:"
for variant in "SEPOLIA" "Sepolia" "sepolia"; do
  echo "Usage of $variant:"
  rg "\b$variant\b" --type md --type ts --type js
done

Length of output: 8106


386-386: Verify Unichain documentation references

Since this PR is about the Holocene upgrade for Unichain, ensure all documentation references are consistent with this new term.

✅ Verification successful

No documentation updates needed for Unichain

Based on the search results, the term "Unichain" only appears in the words.txt file and is referenced once in pages/builders/notices/holocene-changes.mdx specifically in the context of "Unichain Sepolia" testnet upgrade. There are no other documentation references that need to be updated, as this appears to be a testnet-specific term rather than a broader terminology change.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for Unichain references in documentation
echo "Searching for Unichain references:"
rg -i "unichain" --type md

echo -e "\nChecking for potential inconsistencies in chain naming:"
rg -i "chain|network" --type md | grep -i "uni"

Length of output: 280


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to find any documentation files first
echo "Finding documentation files:"
fd -e md -e mdx -e txt

echo -e "\nSearching for any mentions of 'uni' in these files:"
fd -e md -e mdx -e txt -X grep -i "uni" || true

echo -e "\nChecking the words.txt file specifically:"
cat words.txt | grep -i "uni"

Length of output: 66778

@krofax krofax merged commit 64e780a into main Dec 3, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@krofax krofax deleted the unichain branch December 3, 2024 12:58
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants