Sb/u13 notice page #1519
Sb/u13 notice page #1519
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-optimism ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new Markdown file has been added at Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pages/notices/upgrade-13.mdx (1)
1-16: Frontmatter Metadata Validation
The frontmatter includes all the required fields (title, description, lang, content_type, topic, personas, and categories) with non-empty values. One minor suggestion: if the consuming system expects a boolean foris_imported_content, consider using a boolean value (i.e.falsewithout quotes) instead of a string.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pages/notices/upgrade-13.mdx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria: - First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file: 1. For regular pages, ensure AL...
**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file:
- For regular pages, ensure ALL these fields are present and not empty:
--- title: [non-empty] lang: [non-empty] description: [non-empty] topic: [non-empty] personas: [non-empty array] categories: [non-empty array] content_type: [valid type] ---
- For landing pages (index.mdx or files with ), only these fields are required:
--- title: [non-empty] lang: [non-empty] description: [non-empty] topic: [non-empty] ---
- If any required fields are missing or empty, comment:
'This file appears to be missing required metadata. You can fix this by running:Review the changes, then run without :dry to apply them.'pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "path/to/this/file.mdx"- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/notices/upgrade-13.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Redirect rules - docs-optimism
- GitHub Check: Header rules - docs-optimism
- GitHub Check: Pages changed - docs-optimism
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pages/notices/upgrade-13.mdx (3)
18-19: Import Statement Verification
The import statement correctly brings in theStepsandCalloutcomponents fromnextra/componentsfor later use in the document.
20-21: Header (H1) Formatting Check
The H1 header ("Upgrade 13: OPCM and incident response improvements") adheres to the sentence case guideline. The use of the acronym "OPCM" is preserved, and the overall format is clear and descriptive.
22-23: Header (H2) Formatting Check
The H2 header ("What's included in Upgrade 13") is clear and follows the sentence-case style. As the document develops further, ensure that subsequent sections continue with this clarity and adherence to the style guidelines.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
pages/stack/opcm.mdx (1)
18-18: Refine language for consistency.
The sentence “For each smart contract release there will be a new OPCM instance” is clear; however, consider using the singular “contract release” for consistency with phrases such as “once per contract release.”
Example diff:-For each smart contract release there will be a new OPCM instance. +For each contract release there will be a new OPCM instance.pages/notices/upgrade-13.mdx (3)
1-16: Validate frontmatter metadata.
The frontmatter includes all required fields; however, note that the description reads “Learn how to prepare for Isthmus upgrade breaking changes,” while the title and subsequent content consistently refer to “Upgrade 13.” For consistency and clarity, consider aligning the terminology.
Example diff:-description: Learn how to prepare for Isthmus upgrade breaking changes. +description: Learn how to prepare for Upgrade 13 breaking changes.
38-50: Review technical details in OPCM section.
The “OP Contracts Manager” block is well described. One point to check: the phrase on line 49 (“...ensure compatibility with the L1 Pectra upgrade’s introduction of EIP-7702”) might contain a typographical error. Verify whether “Pectra” is the intended term or if a correction (e.g., “Spectra”) is needed.
51-65: Address potential function naming typo.
Within the Fault Proofs incident response improvements section, line 62 refers to`OptimsimPortal.setRespectedGameType(...)`This appears to be a typographical error. It should likely read “OptimismPortal” for consistency with related function calls.
Example diff:-* `OptimsimPortal.setRespectedGameType(...)` no longer sets the respected game type and retirement timestamp simultaneously +* `OptimismPortal.setRespectedGameType(...)` no longer sets the respected game type and retirement timestamp simultaneously
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
pages/notices/_meta.json(1 hunks)pages/notices/upgrade-13.mdx(1 hunks)pages/stack/_meta.json(1 hunks)pages/stack/opcm.mdx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- pages/notices/_meta.json
- pages/stack/_meta.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.mdx`: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria: - First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file: 1. For regular pages, ensure AL...
**/*.mdx: "ALWAYS review Markdown content THOROUGHLY with the following criteria:
- First, check the frontmatter section at the top of the file:
- For regular pages, ensure ALL these fields are present and not empty:
--- title: [non-empty] lang: [non-empty] description: [non-empty] topic: [non-empty] personas: [non-empty array] categories: [non-empty array] content_type: [valid type] ---
- For landing pages (index.mdx or files with ), only these fields are required:
--- title: [non-empty] lang: [non-empty] description: [non-empty] topic: [non-empty] ---
- If any required fields are missing or empty, comment:
'This file appears to be missing required metadata. You can fix this by running:Review the changes, then run without :dry to apply them.'pnpm metadata-batch-cli:dry "path/to/this/file.mdx"- Use proper nouns in place of personal pronouns like 'We' and 'Our' to maintain consistency in communal documentation.
- Avoid gender-specific language and use the imperative form.
- Monitor capitalization for emphasis. Avoid using all caps, italics, or bold for emphasis.
- Ensure proper nouns are capitalized in sentences.
- Apply the Oxford comma.
- Use proper title case for buttons, tab names, page names, and links. Sentence case should be used for body content and short phrases, even in links.
- Use correct spelling and grammar at all times (IMPORTANT).
- For H1, H2, and H3 headers:
- Use sentence case, capitalizing only the first word.
- Preserve the capitalization of proper nouns, technical terms, and acronyms as defined in the 'nouns.txt' file located in the root directory of the project.
- Do not automatically lowercase words that appear in the 'nouns.txt' file, regardless of their position in the header.
- Flag any headers that seem to inconsistently apply these rules for manual review.
- When reviewing capitalization, always refer to the 'nouns.txt' file for the correct capitalization of proper nouns and technical terms specific to the project.
"
pages/stack/opcm.mdxpages/notices/upgrade-13.mdx
🪛 LanguageTool
pages/stack/opcm.mdx
[uncategorized] ~21-~21: Did you mean “contract”? If following ‘per’, nouns are often singular.
Context: ...ation Contracts.** This occurs once per contracts release in production. 3. **Deploy OP ...
(CONFUSION_OF_NNS_NN_UN)
[style] ~22-~22: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
Context: ... contracts release in production. 3. Deploy OP Chain Contracts. This occurs for e...
(ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
pages/stack/opcm.mdx (2)
12-12: Enhance upgrade reference clarity.
The updated sentence effectively informs readers that, as of Upgrade 13, OPCM instances can upgrade existing OP Stack chains. Please double-check that the proposal URL is accurate and that the language aligns with other documentation references.
24-24: Confirm post‐upgrade usage clarity.
This added sentence clearly states that after the Upgrade 13 network upgrade, OPCM instances will also be employed to upgrade existing chains. Verify if any additional nuances (for example, eligibility or limitations) need to be addressed in related documentation.pages/notices/upgrade-13.mdx (7)
18-18: Confirm import correctness.
The import ofStepsandCalloutfromnextra/componentsis correct and aligns with component usage in the document.
20-24: Introduction clarity review.
The main header and introductory paragraph clearly outline what the document covers, including links to the upgrade proposal and governance vote. Ensure that contact instructions (“reach out to developer support”) reflect the current support processes.
26-33: Bullet list effectiveness.
The section “What’s included in Upgrade 13” uses a concise bullet list to summarize the three components. The presentation is clear and informative.
77-79: Callout formatting review.
The callout block is clearly formatted and effectively highlights the critical instruction regarding pending withdrawal proofs.
81-89: DeputyPauseModule section review.
The description of theDeputyPauseModuleis clear and well organized. No changes are needed.
91-97: For chain operators section validation.
The instructions for chain operators are straightforward and comprehensive. They effectively communicate the required actions if the proposal is accepted.
97-127: Overall content structure and clarity.
The sections for users, audit reports, and emergency cancellation are well structured and detailed, providing a clear guide for all stakeholders. The language is precise and consistent aside from the minor issues noted above.
Description
Tests
Additional context
Metadata