Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revamp github issue/PR config #5066

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Jun 1, 2022
Merged

Revamp github issue/PR config #5066

merged 23 commits into from
Jun 1, 2022

Conversation

Pandapip1
Copy link
Member

See https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/configuring-issue-templates-for-your-repository#configuring-the-template-chooser for syntax.

Hopefully, this will result in more EIP working papers being sent to Ethereum Magicians, discussions-to links being created on Ethereum Magicians, EIP-Bot, and eipv issues being reported in the correct repository.

I have tentatively put the EIPIP repo as the place to submit suggestions related to the EIP process. EIP editors, feel free to suggest otherwise.

@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented May 1, 2022

All tests passed; auto-merging...

(pass) .github/CONTRIBUTING.md

classification
ambiguous
  • file .github/CONTRIBUTING.md is not a valid filename, but this error has been ignored due to editor approvals

(pass) .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md

classification
ambiguous
  • file .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md is not a valid filename, but this error has been ignored due to editor approvals

(pass) .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml

classification
ambiguous
  • file .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml is not a valid filename, but this error has been ignored due to editor approvals

(pass) .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/propose-process-change.md

classification
ambiguous
  • file .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/propose-process-change.md is not a valid filename, but this error has been ignored due to editor approvals

(pass) .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

classification
ambiguous
  • file .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md is not a valid filename, but this error has been ignored due to editor approvals

@MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

Do you have an example of what this will look like?

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member Author

Pandapip1 commented May 4, 2022

Hold on. I'll stick the file in the main branch of my fork (which I use for testing how GitHub reacts to changes like this).

EDIT: Apparently, as configured, it gets rid of the issues tab. I need to find out what causes that so I can fix it, as that is unintentional.

EDIT 2: Apparently I had disabled the issues feature on my fork. Oops.

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member Author

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member Author

Pandapip1 commented May 5, 2022

While we're at it, should I move the PR and issue template out of the root of the repository into the .github folder?

EDIT: I'll just repurpose the PR to do some general cleaning up / improvement of the issue and PR configs

@Pandapip1 Pandapip1 changed the title Propose contact links to reduce the number of issues made in error Revamp github issue/PR config May 5, 2022
@MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the example, I like this idea generally. I left some suggestions for reframing the titles into questions, curious how others feel. Also, the last one should probably be an issue here. We historically haven't used EIPIP repository for discussion about changes to the EIP process, we use EIPIP issues for discussion about changes to the EIPIP process. 😆

Pandapip1 and others added 3 commits May 6, 2022 07:36
Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>
Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>
Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>
@MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

I approve, but want to wait to merge until some other editors have spoken up.

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member Author

Pandapip1 commented May 13, 2022

Since no EIP editors have responded yet, I'll CC them: @lightclient @axic @SamWilsn @gcolvin

.github/CONTRIBUTING.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@SamWilsn
Copy link
Contributor

SamWilsn commented May 13, 2022

Did you remove the option to submit an improvement for the EIP process? I feel like that's supposed to point to https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/new


Besides that, I love this idea.

@gcolvin
Copy link
Contributor

gcolvin commented May 13, 2022

Looks good to me. Thanks!

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member Author

Did you remove the option to submit an improvement for the EIP process? I feel like that's supposed to point to https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/new

The main and the patch-8 branches are desynced. I'll re-sync them now.

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry for the late response. I've switched the default branch of Pandapip1/EIPs to patch-8, so https://github.com/Pandapip1/EIPs/issues/new/choose will be up to date.

@Pandapip1 Pandapip1 requested a review from MicahZoltu May 27, 2022 14:18
@MicahZoltu
Copy link
Contributor

Sam's most recent comment still seems pertinent after you fixed the desync. I don't see an option for "Do you want to propose a change to the EIP process itself?" in the list (which should direct the user to creating a new blank issue).

@Pandapip1
Copy link
Member Author

Sam's most recent comment still seems pertinent after you fixed the desync. I don't see an option for "Do you want to propose a change to the EIP process itself?" in the list (which should direct the user to creating a new blank issue).

Fixed.

@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu closed this Jun 1, 2022
@MicahZoltu MicahZoltu reopened this Jun 1, 2022
@eth-bot eth-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 1, 2022 07:10
@eth-bot eth-bot merged commit 11b3678 into ethereum:master Jun 1, 2022
@Pandapip1 Pandapip1 mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2022
nachomazzara pushed a commit to nachomazzara/EIPs that referenced this pull request Jan 13, 2023
* Create template for ERC4825

* It's 4829 apparently

* Forgot that field was there

* Undo all changes in _config.yml

* Rename LICENSE to LICENSE.md

* Test: add preamble

* Propose contact links to reduce the number of issues made in error

* Create config.yml

* Revamp some configstuff

* Few more changes I'm testing

* Undo that merge

* This is surprisingly annoying

* I'll just keep it this way

* Rephrase Ethereum Magicians

Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>

* Rephrase EIP Bot issues

Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>

* Rephrase eipv issues

Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>

* Remove eipip link

* Replace w/ absolute link

* Update issue templates

* Rename do-you-want-to-propose-a-change-to-the-eip-process-itself-.md to propose-process-change.md

* Delete custom.md

Co-authored-by: Micah Zoltu <micah@zoltu.net>
Birdza87

This comment was marked as spam.

Copy link

@ghost ghost left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ghost referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2023
Merged by EIP-Bot.
ghost referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants