Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ERC: Temporary Approval Extension for ERC-20 #358

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
58 changes: 58 additions & 0 deletions ERCS/erc-7674.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
---
eip: 7674
title: Temporary Approval Extension for ERC-20
description: An interface for ERC-20 approvals via transient storage
byshape marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
author: Xenia Shape (@byshape), Mikhail Melnik (@ZumZoom), Hadrien Croubois (@Amxx)
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/add-erc-7674-transient-approval-extension-for-erc-20/19521
status: Draft
type: Standards Track
category: ERC
created: 2024-04-02
requires: 20, 1153
---

## Abstract

This specification defines the minimum interface required to temporarily approve `ERC-20` tokens for spending within a single transaction.
byshape marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
byshape marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Motivation

`EIP-1153` allows to use a cheaper way to temporarily store allowances.
byshape marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
SamWilsn marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Specification

The key words "MUST", "SHOULD", "MAY" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 and RFC 8174.

Compliant contracts MUST implement 1 new function in addition to `ERC-20`:
SamWilsn marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
```solidity
function temporaryApprove(address spender, uint256 value) public returns (bool success)
```
Call to `temporaryApprove(spender, value)` allows `spender` to withdraw within the same transaction from `msg.sender` multiple times, up to the `value` amount.
byshape marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

The storage for the temporary allowances MUST be different to that of the regular allowance. Compliant contracts MAY use the transient storage `EIP-1153` to keep the temporary allowance. For each `owner` and `spender`, the slot MUST be uniquely selected to avoid slot collision. Each slot index SHOULD be derived from the base slot index for temporary allowances, `owner` and `spender` addresses. Slot MAY be derived as `keccak256(spender . keccak256(owner . p))` where `.` is concatenation and `p` is `keccak256` from the string uniquely defining temporary allowances in the namespace of the implementing contract.

Compliant contracts MUST add a temporary allowance check to the `transferFrom` function. The permanent allowance SHOULD only be spent after the temporary allowance has been exhausted.

Compliant contracts MUST add a temporary allowance to the permanent one when returning the allowed amount to spend in the `allowance` function. In case the sum of the temporary and permanent allowance overflow, `type(uint256).max` MUST be returned.

No event is required when setting a temporary allowance, but compliant contracts MAY implement it.
SamWilsn marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Rationale

The main goal of this standard is to make it cheaper to approve `ERC-20` tokens for a single transaction with minimal interface extension to allow easier integration of a compliant contract into existing infrastructure. This affects the backward compatibility of the `allowance` function. However, the required changes to the `transferFrom` function implementation satisfy the requirement to explicitly authorize the spender to transfer tokens.
SamWilsn marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Backwards Compatibility

All functionality of the `ERC-20` standard is backward compatible except for the `allowance` function.

## Reference Implementation

TBD
SamWilsn marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

## Security Considerations

The method of deriving slot identifiers to store temporary allowances must avoid collision with other slots in the same space (e.g. transient storage).

## Copyright

Copyright and related rights waived via [CC0](../LICENSE.md).
Loading