Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Attestation changes + persistent committee changes #1294
Attestation changes + persistent committee changes #1294
Changes from 7 commits
99a5060
14010f5
0cfca01
f77df3f
bcfff59
be1bc52
7ca5031
ac29581
2b2b143
b5de66a
8611f91
eb03f03
1bc65ca
8f0ad70
6812e46
827b181
96b3cb9
d33ee7c
b859b26
8299399
2af058f
4951768
7f2e773
cc80342
8ba1408
f523ddd
c7f8b11
7df91f8
e035344
dc77c06
ad30945
21f4e03
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
And the whole
### TODO PLACEHOLDER
section.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we are losing value by removing
shard
here by not being able to immediately recognize a shard block as being from a particular shard and instead just understanding it in the context of it's parent and the state (that must be calculated) related to thestate_root
.We still have 80 bytes to play with in
ShardBlockCore
now that we have divided it into two 256-byte halvesThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can see that; I'd be ok with putting it back in (though we'd have to take it back out if we decide we want to add another slot as then we would exceed 8; or we could add slot offsets for different shards 😄)