Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix failing persistence test #554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024
Merged

fix: fix failing persistence test #554

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

pk910
Copy link
Member

@pk910 pk910 commented Apr 10, 2024

fixed the failing persistence test by re-ordering the clients list.

The test fails because initialization of all EL clients takes longer than the initial genesis delay.
Due to this, lighhouse returns an unhealty result for its health check as it's post-genesis and not following a chain / has no peers.
The kurtosis package waits for a healthy result, which never occurs as all other BNs & VCs are missing at that point.

The fix proposed in this PR is a workaround as it moves the lighthouse node further down to ensure it can connect to other nodes initialized before.

There is an alternative approach to fix this issue:

network_params:
  genesis_delay: 300

which ensures all clients are properly initialized before the network starts.

@pk910 pk910 merged commit 99242d6 into main Apr 12, 2024
20 checks passed
@pk910 pk910 deleted the pk910/fix-persistence-test branch April 12, 2024 15:41
barnabasbusa pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[2.2.0](2.1.0...2.2.0)
(2024-04-19)


### Features

* add assertoor test for per PR CI job
([#537](#537))
([8ef5c57](8ef5c57))
* add blutgang rpc load balancer
([#569](#569))
([1be5f95](1be5f95))
* add dugtrio beacon load balancer
([#568](#568))
([56d2fa3](56d2fa3))
* add new assertoor test to per ci jobs
([#545](#545))
([3005d46](3005d46))
* use new rpc snooper from `ethpandaops/rpc-snooper`
([#567](#567))
([5676f0d](5676f0d))


### Bug Fixes

* add --contract-deployment-block parameter for Prysm
([#557](#557))
([d8dfbae](d8dfbae))
* Added '--enable-private-discovery' to Grandine
([#541](#541))
([a1ae708](a1ae708))
* beaconchain explorer
([#531](#531))
([b62ed6f](b62ed6f))
* beaconchain explorer
([#538](#538))
([ce1f337](ce1f337))
* blobber incorrect url
([#528](#528))
([6f84e3d](6f84e3d))
* bump json rpc snooper
([#553](#553))
([f69c4a7](f69c4a7))
* disable full sync if gcmode is archive
([#563](#563))
([b7592ec](b7592ec))
* disable pbss when gcmode archive set
([#559](#559))
([e085462](e085462))
* disable pbss when gcmode archive set, force hash based init
([#562](#562))
([3e1c7a6](3e1c7a6))
* disable static peers
([#529](#529))
([c5d4028](c5d4028))
* enable single node mode on lodestar by default
([#558](#558))
([555ad7d](555ad7d))
* fix doc string typo
([#560](#560))
([13de3f6](13de3f6))
* fix failing persistence test
([#554](#554))
([99242d6](99242d6))
* increase mem limit of snooper
([#546](#546))
([6ba5770](6ba5770))
* prysm beacon http url
([#536](#536))
([4914531](4914531))
* prysm beacon_http_url
([#535](#535))
([ee7528c](ee7528c))
* prysm vc
([#533](#533))
([72ddeb2](72ddeb2))
* remove un-needed prysm vc check
([#542](#542))
([f6326fe](f6326fe))
* set application protocol to be http for rpc
([#548](#548))
([905de7c](905de7c))
* set the correct default vc image
([#544](#544))
([953741d](953741d))
* uniformize keymanager
([#534](#534))
([a6a2830](a6a2830))
* update prometheus api
([#539](#539))
([d2b9fb8](d2b9fb8))
* update vc <> cl matrix
([#564](#564))
([0ffcf74](0ffcf74))
* update vc compatibility matrix
([#543](#543))
([58c4684](58c4684))
* use `minimal-preset` images for dora & assertoor when minimal preset
is used
([#532](#532))
([ad7773e](ad7773e))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants