3104-3105-3106-3107 feature/vertical sidebar, projects, favorites and role based navigation in sidebar #3199
Conversation
…r data based on user roles
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing task management features and localization support. Key additions include new custom React hooks for managing team tasks and favorites, updates to sidebar components for dynamic rendering, and significant localization enhancements across various languages. Configuration files are also modified to improve spell checking and editor settings. Overall, the changes aim to improve user interaction with task management functionalities while expanding language support. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
NdekoCode
added
enhancement
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 36
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
apps/web/lib/config/constants.tsx (1)
4-61: Consider adding role-based feature flags.Since this PR involves role-based navigation in the sidebar, consider extending the role definitions to include feature flags or capability sets that can be used for UI rendering decisions.
Example enhancement:
interface RoleCapabilities { canAccessProjects: boolean; canManageUsers: boolean; canViewAnalytics: boolean; // ... other capabilities } interface Role { // ... existing properties capabilities: RoleCapabilities; }apps/web/app/hooks/features/useActiveTeam.ts (1)
17-19: Enhance comment documentation.Consider adding more context to the comment, explaining why stopping the timer is necessary when switching teams.
-/** - * If timer started in Teams and user switches the Team, stop the timer - */ +/** + * When switching teams, we need to stop any running timer to prevent + * time tracking across different teams. This ensures accurate time + * tracking per team and prevents confusion in reporting. + */apps/web/lib/utils.ts (1)
80-90: Consider type refinements and documentationThe function implementation is logically sound, but could benefit from some improvements:
- The
any | ReactNodetype is redundant sinceReactNodealready covers all possible React node types- Adding JSDoc documentation would help explain the function's purpose and usage
Consider this enhancement:
+/** + * Type guard to check if a value is a valid JSX element or array of JSX elements + * @param node - The value to check + * @returns True if the value is a JSX.Element or array of JSX.Element + */ -export function isJSXElement(node: any | ReactNode): node is JSX.Element | JSX.Element[] { +export function isJSXElement(node: ReactNode): node is JSX.Element | JSX.Element[] { if (React.isValidElement(node)) { return true; } if (Array.isArray(node)) { return node.every((item) => React.isValidElement(item)); } return false; }apps/web/lib/layout/navbar.tsx (1)
Line range hint
41-93: Consider component decomposition for better maintainabilityThe Navbar component handles multiple concerns (authentication, layout, team management, etc.). Consider breaking it down into smaller, focused components:
AuthenticatedNavPublicTeamNavNavigationItemsThis would improve:
- Code maintainability
- Testing
- Reusability
- Separation of concerns
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationTeamManagers.ts (1)
6-13: Consider enhancing documentation with usage examples.The JSDoc comments are well-structured, but adding an @example section would make it easier for other developers to understand how to use this hook correctly.
Consider adding:
* @returns An object with two properties: * - `userManagedTeams`: An array of teams that the authenticated user manages. * - `filteredTeams`: An array of teams that the authenticated user manages, filtered based on the `filterValue` atom. + * + * @example + * ```tsx + * function TeamList() { + * const { userManagedTeams, filteredTeams } = useOrganizationAndTeamManagers(); + * // Use the teams... + * } + * ``` */apps/web/lib/features/task/task-issue.tsx (2)
Line range hint
74-80: Remove commented-out code.If this feature is no longer needed, consider removing the commented-out code to improve code maintainability. If it's planned for future use, consider tracking it in a separate issue.
Line range hint
171-207: Implement form submission logic in CreateTaskIssueModal.The form submission handler only prevents the default action but doesn't implement any actual functionality. Consider implementing the issue creation logic or removing the form if it's not needed.
Would you like help implementing the issue creation logic for this form?
.cspell.json (1)
80-80: Consider using standard spelling "collapsible".The word "collapsable" is a common variant, but "collapsible" is the standard spelling in most style guides.
Apply this diff to use the standard spelling:
- "collapsable", + "collapsible",apps/web/lib/features/team/user-team-card/user-team-card-menu.tsx (1)
97-97: Optimize className for better maintainability.The layout changes look good, but the className could be simplified using Tailwind's composition.
-className="relative flex flex-col items-center justify-center w-full" +className="relative flex flex-col items-center w-full"Note:
justify-centeris redundant when usingitems-centerin a flex-col layout.Also applies to: 130-130, 132-132, 203-203
apps/web/components/pages/task/title-block/task-title-block.tsx (1)
223-241: Enhance accessibility for the favorites buttonThe favorites toggle button should have an aria-label and aria-pressed state for better accessibility.
<button className="flex items-center gap-1 cursor-pointer w-fit h-fit" onClick={() => toggleFavorite(task)} + aria-label={isFavoriteTask ? t('common.REMOVE_FAVORITE') : t('common.ADD_FAVORITE')} + aria-pressed={isFavoriteTask} >apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationTeams.ts (1)
162-279: Documentation improvements suggested.The documentation is comprehensive, but could be enhanced by:
- Adding
@throwsdocumentation for potential error cases- Including return type information in the example
- Adding examples for error handling scenarios
apps/web/locales/zh.json (1)
107-110: Consider grouping related translations together.While the translations are accurate, consider reorganizing the structure to group related translations. The
CREATE_PROJECTtranslation (line 120) is separated from other project-related translations (line 109). Consider moving it closer to maintain better organization.Also applies to: 120-120
apps/web/locales/nl.json (1)
107-110: Consider grouping related translations together.The translations are accurate and well-formatted. However, consider grouping the project-related translation (
CREATE_PROJECT) with the other project and task management translations for better maintainability.{ "common": { "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Taak uit favorieten verwijderen", "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Taak toevoegen aan favorieten", "NO_PROJECT": "Geen project", "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Nog geen favoriete taak", + "CREATE_PROJECT": "Nieuw project aanmaken", "LINK_TASK": "Gerelateerde kwestie selecteren", ... - "CREATE_PROJECT": "Nieuw project aanmaken",Also applies to: 120-120
apps/web/locales/pl.json (1)
106-109: Consider consistent capitalization in common section messages.While the translations are semantically correct, consider capitalizing the first letter of each word in action messages for consistency with the sidebar style:
- "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Usuń zadanie z ulubionych", - "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Dodaj zadanie do ulubionych", - "NO_PROJECT": "Brak projektu", - "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Brak ulubionych zadań", - "CREATE_PROJECT": "Utwórz nowy projekt", + "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Usuń Zadanie Z Ulubionych", + "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Dodaj Zadanie Do Ulubionych", + "NO_PROJECT": "Brak Projektu", + "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Brak Ulubionych Zadań", + "CREATE_PROJECT": "Utwórz Nowy Projekt",Also applies to: 119-119
apps/web/locales/it.json (1)
106-109: Consider improving the word order in the "NO_FAVORITE_TASK" translation.The current translation "Nessuna attività preferita ancora" would sound more natural in Italian as "Nessuna attività ancora preferita" or "Ancora nessuna attività preferita".
- "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Nessuna attività preferita ancora", + "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Ancora nessuna attività preferita",apps/web/locales/pt.json (2)
106-109: Consider revising the favorites-related translations for more natural phrasing.The current translations are functional but could be more idiomatic:
- "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Remover tarefa dos favoritos", - "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Adicionar tarefa aos favoritos", - "NO_PROJECT": "Nenhum projeto", - "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Ainda não há tarefas favoritas", + "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Remover dos favoritos", + "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Adicionar aos favoritos", + "NO_PROJECT": "Nenhum projeto disponível", + "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Nenhuma tarefa favorita"
119-119: Maintain consistent capitalization in translations.The translation for "CREATE_PROJECT" should follow the same capitalization pattern as other similar actions in the file.
- "CREATE_PROJECT": "Criar novo projeto", + "CREATE_PROJECT": "Criar Novo Projeto",apps/web/locales/es.json (1)
108-111: Consider grouping related translations together.While the translations are accurate, consider moving
"CREATE_PROJECT"to be grouped with other project-related translations for better maintainability. Currently, it's separated from related functionality.{ "common": { "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Eliminar tarea de favoritos", "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Agregar tarea a favoritos", "NO_PROJECT": "Sin proyecto", "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Aún no hay tareas favoritas", + "CREATE_PROJECT": "Crear nuevo proyecto", "LINK_TASK": "Seleccionar problema relacionado", ... - "CREATE_PROJECT": "Crear nuevo proyecto",Also applies to: 121-121
apps/web/locales/de.json (1)
106-109: Consider standardizing terminology for consistency.While the translations are accurate, consider standardizing the term "Favoriten":
- "Favoritenaufgabe" (line 109) vs "Favoriten" (line 6)
- Consider using "Favoriten-Aufgabe" for consistency with the sidebar terminology.
- "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Noch keine Favoritenaufgabe", + "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Noch keine Favoriten-Aufgabe",Also applies to: 119-119
apps/web/locales/fr.json (1)
Line range hint
1-1000: Consider standardizing formatting conventions.For better maintainability and consistency:
- Standardize the use of "et" instead of "&" throughout the file
- Maintain consistent capitalization in translations (currently mixed)
Example standardizations:
-"TIME_AND_ACTIVITY": "Temps & Activité", +"TIME_AND_ACTIVITY": "Temps et activités", -"ACTUAL_AND_EXPECTED_HOURS": "Heures réelles & prévues", +"ACTUAL_AND_EXPECTED_HOURS": "Heures réelles et prévues"apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx (2)
Line range hint
4-24: Consider organizing imports.The imports section is quite long and could benefit from better organization. Consider grouping imports into:
- React and related packages
- Third-party libraries
- Internal components and utilities
- Types and interfaces
'use client'; /* eslint-disable no-mixed-spaces-and-tabs */ + // React and related import React, { Fragment, MutableRefObject, PropsWithChildren, useCallback, useEffect, useMemo, useState } from 'react'; + import Image from 'next/legacy/image'; + // Third-party libraries import { Listbox, Transition } from '@headlessui/react'; import { ChevronDownIcon } from '@heroicons/react/20/solid'; import { XMarkIcon } from '@heroicons/react/24/outline'; import { useTheme } from 'next-themes'; import { readableColor } from 'polished'; import capitalize from 'lodash/capitalize'; + // Internal components and utilities import { Card, Tooltip } from 'lib/components'; import { Square4OutlineIcon, CircleIcon } from 'assets/svg'; import { cn } from '@/lib/utils'; import { Queue, clsxm } from '@app/utils'; import { useCallbackRef, useSyncRef, useTaskLabels, useTaskPriorities, useTaskSizes, useTaskStatus, useTaskVersion, useTeamTasks } from '@app/hooks'; + // Types and interfaces import { IClassName, ITaskStatusField, ITaskStatusItemList, ITaskStatusStack, ITeamTask, Nullable, Tag, TaskStatusEnum } from '@app/interfaces';
Based on the results, I can generate the final response as we have sufficient information showing inconsistent utility usage and potential issues with template literals.
Inconsistent className utilities and incorrect template literal usage need attention
- The file still heavily uses
clsxm(17 instances) while only having 2 instances ofcn, indicating incomplete transition- The template literal syntax
cn(\fill-[${readableColorHex}]`)` won't work correctly with Tailwind - dynamic color values should use style attribute instead- For consistency and proper functionality, you should:
- Complete the transition from
clsxmtocnthroughout the file- Replace the dynamic color template literal with inline style, e.g.,
style={{fill: readableColorHex}}🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
861-872: Verify the usage ofcnutility function.The code is transitioning from
clsxmtocnutility, but the change is not consistent throughout the file. Additionally, the template literal syntax for dynamic color values might not work as expected with thecnutility.Let's verify the usage of both utilities in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for remaining uses of clsxm and cn to ensure consistent usage echo "Checking clsxm usage:" rg "clsxm\(" apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx echo "Checking cn usage:" rg "cn\(" apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx # Check if cn utility supports template literals echo "Checking cn implementation:" rg "export.*function cn" apps/web/lib/utils.tsLength of output: 1207
apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (4)
73-79: Use unique keys instead of index in list renderingUsing array indices as keys in list rendering can lead to unexpected behavior if the list items are reordered or modified. It's better to use a unique identifier from the data, such as
task.id, for thekeyprop to ensure consistency.Apply this diff to update the
keyprop:- .map((task, index) => ({ + .map((task) => ({ ... - key={index} + key={task.id}
158-158: Use unique keys instead of index in list renderingSimilarly, when rendering the managed teams, use a unique identifier like
team.idfor thekeyprop instead of the index to prevent potential issues with list rendering.Apply this diff to update the
keyprop:- key={index} + key={team.id}
199-199: Use standard Tailwind CSS border width classThe class
border-[0.0938rem]is unconventional and may affect readability. Consider using the standard Tailwind CSS border width classborderfor better consistency and maintainability.Apply this diff:
- className="w-full text-xs mt-3 dark:text-white rounded-xl border-[0.0938rem]" + className="w-full text-xs mt-3 dark:text-white rounded-xl border"
280-280: Remove unnecessary leading space in class nameThere's an extra leading space in the class name string, which could lead to unintended styling issues. Removing it ensures the class names are correctly interpreted.
Apply this diff:
- state === 'collapsed' ? 'right-[-20%]' : ' right-[-5%]', + state === 'collapsed' ? 'right-[-20%]' : 'right-[-5%]',
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (35)
- .cspell.json (11 hunks)
- .vscode/settings.json (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/hooks/features/useActiveTeam.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/hooks/features/useFavoritesTask.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationTeamManagers.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationTeams.ts (3 hunks)
- apps/web/app/hooks/features/useTeamTasks.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/web/app/hooks/useQuery.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/app/stores/team-tasks.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/components/nav-main.tsx (3 hunks)
- apps/web/components/pages/task/title-block/task-title-block.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/config/constants.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/features/task/task-card.tsx (4 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/features/task/task-issue.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/features/task/task-status.tsx (8 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/features/team/user-team-card/user-team-card-menu.tsx (6 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/features/user-nav-menu.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/layout/MainSidebarTrigger.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/layout/main-layout.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/layout/navbar.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/utils.ts (2 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/ar.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/bg.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/de.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/en.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/es.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/fr.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/he.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/it.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/nl.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/pl.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/pt.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/ru.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/zh.json (3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .vscode/settings.json
- apps/web/app/hooks/useQuery.ts
- apps/web/lib/features/user-nav-menu.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useActiveTeam.ts
[error] 21-22: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationTeams.ts
[error] 314-318: Unnecessary use of boolean literals in conditional expression.
Simplify your code by directly assigning the result without using a ternary operator.
If your goal is negation, you may use the logical NOT (!) or double NOT (!!) operator for clearer and concise code.
Check for more details about NOT operator.
Unsafe fix: Remove the conditional expression with(lint/complexity/noUselessTernary)
[error] 357-357: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 360-360: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 426-426: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 491-491: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useTeamTasks.ts
[error] 169-169: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 171-171: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 216-216: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 480-480: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
apps/web/lib/features/task/task-card.tsx
[error] 284-293: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
[error] 298-300: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
[error] 391-391: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 445-445: Change to an optional chain.
Unsafe fix: Change to an optional chain.
(lint/complexity/useOptionalChain)
[error] 685-708: Avoid using unnecessary Fragment.
A fragment is redundant if it contains only one child, or if it is the child of a html element, and is not a keyed fragment.
Unsafe fix: Remove the Fragment(lint/complexity/noUselessFragments)
🔇 Additional comments (54)
apps/web/lib/layout/MainSidebarTrigger.tsx (3)
1-3: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.The imports are clean and follow React best practices, using appropriate named imports and path aliases.
16-16: LGTM! Export statement follows conventions.The default export is appropriate for a single component file.
1-16: Verify component integration and dependencies.Let's verify the component's integration and dependencies in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let's gather more information about the imported components since the previous search patterns didn't find them. They might be exported differently or located in specific files.
Let's search for the sidebar components in a broader scope since they weren't found in the expected location.
Let's check the content of the sidebar.tsx file since we found it in the search results, as it likely contains the required components and hooks.
Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response:
The component's integration and dependencies are properly implemented.
The verification confirms that:
- The
SidebarTriggercomponent anduseSidebarhook are correctly imported from@/components/ui/sidebar.tsx, which contains their implementations- The component is properly used in
main-layout.tsxas a child component- The component correctly uses the sidebar context through the
useSidebarhook to access mobile-specific functionality🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify component integration and dependencies # Test 1: Check where this component is being used echo "Checking MainSidebarTrigger usage:" rg -l "MainSidebarTrigger" # Test 2: Verify SidebarTrigger component implementation echo -e "\nVerifying SidebarTrigger component:" ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function SidebarTrigger' || ast-grep --pattern 'export const SidebarTrigger' # Test 3: Verify useSidebar hook implementation echo -e "\nVerifying useSidebar hook:" ast-grep --pattern 'export $_ function useSidebar' || ast-grep --pattern 'export const useSidebar'Length of output: 450
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for SidebarTrigger and useSidebar with broader patterns echo "Searching for SidebarTrigger component:" rg -A 5 "SidebarTrigger" "apps/web/components/ui/sidebar" echo -e "\nSearching for useSidebar hook:" rg -A 5 "useSidebar" "apps/web/components/ui/sidebar" # Check the main layout implementation echo -e "\nChecking main-layout.tsx implementation:" cat "apps/web/lib/layout/main-layout.tsx" # Verify if the sidebar components exist in the expected location echo -e "\nListing sidebar-related files:" fd . "apps/web/components/ui/sidebar"Length of output: 3600
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for sidebar-related files and components across the codebase echo "Finding sidebar-related files:" fd sidebar echo -e "\nSearching for SidebarTrigger component definition:" rg -A 5 "export.*SidebarTrigger" echo -e "\nSearching for useSidebar hook definition:" rg -A 5 "export.*useSidebar" echo -e "\nSearching for SidebarProvider definition:" rg -A 5 "export.*SidebarProvider" # Check if these are potentially from a package echo -e "\nChecking package.json for sidebar-related dependencies:" fd package.json --exec cat {} | grep -i sidebarLength of output: 969
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the implementation of sidebar components echo "Checking sidebar.tsx implementation:" cat "apps/web/components/ui/sidebar.tsx" # Also check app-sidebar implementation for context echo -e "\nChecking app-sidebar.tsx implementation:" cat "apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx"Length of output: 31623
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useActiveTeam.ts (4)
1-8: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.The imports are properly structured with the 'use client' directive correctly placed at the top, followed by internal and external dependencies.
9-13: LGTM! Hook initialization follows best practices.The hook properly composes other hooks and follows React naming conventions.
43-44: LGTM! Clean and well-structured hook interface.The hook returns a clear and concise interface with all necessary functions for team management.
11-11: Verify timer hook implementation.Let's ensure the timer hook provides the expected interface and proper type definitions.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the timer hook implementation in the web app:
The first search will help us find the hook implementation, while the second will show us its usage context. This will allow us to verify if the hook provides the expected interface with timerStatus and stopTimer.
Timer hook implementation is properly typed and integrated
The verification shows that:
- The
useTimerhook is properly implemented in both web and mobile apps with consistent interfaces- The hook provides the expected
timerStatusandstopTimerfunctions as used in the review code- The implementation includes proper TypeScript types (ITimerStatus, ITimer, etc.)
- The hook is widely used across the codebase with consistent usage patterns
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useTimer hook implementation and its type definitions ast-grep --pattern 'export const useTimer = () => { $$$ }' # Search for timer-related type definitions rg -A 5 'interface.*Timer|type.*Timer'Length of output: 37836
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for useTimer hook implementation in web app ast-grep --pattern 'export function useTimer() { $$$ }' # Search for useTimer hook usage rg -A 5 'useTimer\(\)'Length of output: 54252
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useFavoritesTask.ts (3)
1-16: LGTM! Well-documented hook with clear purpose.The imports are properly organized and the JSDoc documentation comprehensively describes the hook's functionality and return values.
35-42: LGTM! Well-structured return object.The return object properly exposes all necessary functionality and state.
17-20: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionConsider adding error handling for useTeamTasks.
The hook should handle potential errors from
useTeamTasksto ensure graceful degradation.Let's check how
useTeamTaskshandles errors:Consider adding error handling:
export const useFavoritesTask = () => { - const { tasks } = useTeamTasks(); + const { tasks, error } = useTeamTasks(); + if (error) { + console.error('Failed to fetch team tasks:', error); + return { + tasks: [], + favoriteTasks: [], + toggleFavorite: () => {}, + isFavorite: () => false, + addFavorite: () => {} + }; + } const [favoriteTasks, setFavoriteTasks] = useAtom(favoriteTasksStorageAtom);apps/web/lib/utils.ts (1)
4-4: LGTM: Clean import statementThe import statement correctly brings in the necessary React types for JSX element validation.
apps/web/lib/layout/navbar.tsx (2)
6-6: LGTM: Clean utility import for class name managementThe replacement of
clsxmwithcnutility follows modern React practices for managing conditional class names.
67-67: Verify layout alignment changesThe addition of
ml-autowill right-align the navigation items. Please ensure this:
- Matches the intended design
- Works correctly across all breakpoints
- Maintains proper spacing with the sidebar trigger component
Consider if we need additional responsive classes to maintain layout consistency across different screen sizes.
Let's check for related layout patterns:
✅ Verification successful
Layout alignment change is consistent with existing patterns
The
ml-autoaddition aligns with the app's layout structure:
- The navbar is part of a consistent layout system where
MainSidebarTriggeris positioned on the left- Similar flex patterns with
items-centerandmin-hare used throughout the app for consistent vertical alignment- This is the only instance of right-aligned navigation items using
ml-auto, making it an intentional design choice for the main navigation🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for similar layout patterns in other components rg -t tsx -t jsx "className=.*ml-auto.*items-center.*min-h-\["Length of output: 247
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach to search for layout patterns # First, let's search for files with potential layout components fd -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "className.*ml-auto.*items-center" # Also search for similar navigation/header layouts fd -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "className.*flex.*items-center.*min-h-\[" # Look for the sidebar trigger component to understand layout context fd -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "SidebarTrigger|sidebar.*trigger"Length of output: 1860
apps/web/lib/layout/main-layout.tsx (3)
12-12: LGTM: Clean import additionThe import statement follows proper conventions and is correctly placed with other layout-related imports.
81-81: Verify accessibility of MainSidebarTriggerPlease ensure the MainSidebarTrigger component includes proper ARIA attributes and keyboard navigation support for accessibility.
#!/bin/bash # Check MainSidebarTrigger implementation for accessibility attributes ast-grep --pattern 'MainSidebarTrigger = $$$' -A 10
61-61: Verify AppSidebar usage across the codebaseThe addition of the
publicTeamprop with a fallback value is good. Let's verify other AppSidebar usages to ensure they handle this prop correctly.✅ Verification successful
AppSidebar prop usage is consistent across the codebase
The
publicTeamprop is properly defined in the AppSidebar component and is only used once in main-layout.tsx with the correct fallback value. No other instances of AppSidebar usage were found that would need updating.
apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx: Properly defines the prop type aspublicTeam: boolean | undefinedapps/web/lib/layout/main-layout.tsx: Single usage with correct fallbackpublicTeam={publicTeam || false}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for AppSidebar usage to verify prop handling ast-grep --pattern 'AppSidebar $$$' -A 5Length of output: 53
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for AppSidebar usage with ripgrep for better coverage rg "AppSidebar" -lLength of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for AppSidebar component definition rg "AppSidebar" -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 2933
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Try finding the component with a different AST pattern ast-grep --pattern '<AppSidebar $$$>'Length of output: 39
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationTeamManagers.ts (3)
14-16: LGTM!The hook dependencies and initial setup are clean and follow React best practices.
65-68: LGTM!The return statement is clean and properly structured.
39-63:⚠️ Potential issueRefactor to improve type safety and reduce code duplication.
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Filter values should be type-safe
- Repeated mapping logic could be simplified
- Potential null reference when accessing
member.employee.acceptDateConsider this refactoring:
+type FilterStatus = 'all' | 'pause' | 'running' | 'suspended' | 'invited'; + +const filterTeamMembers = ( + team: typeof userManagedTeams[0], + status: FilterStatus +) => { + if (status === 'all') return team; + + const filterMap = { + pause: (member: typeof team.members[0]) => member.timerStatus === 'pause', + running: (member: typeof team.members[0]) => member.timerStatus === 'running', + suspended: (member: typeof team.members[0]) => member.timerStatus === 'suspended', + invited: (member: typeof team.members[0]) => member.employee?.acceptDate, + }; + + const filterFn = filterMap[status as keyof typeof filterMap]; + if (!filterFn) return team; + + return { + ...team, + members: team.members.filter(filterFn) + }; +}; + const filteredTeams = useMemo(() => { - return filtered === 'all' - ? userManagedTeams - : filtered === 'pause' - ? userManagedTeams.map((team) => ({ - ...team, - members: team.members.filter((member) => member.timerStatus === 'pause') - })) - : // ... rest of the conditions + return userManagedTeams.map(team => filterTeamMembers(team, filtered as FilterStatus)); }, [filtered, userManagedTeams]);Also, consider adding validation:
apps/web/components/nav-main.tsx (1)
30-30: LGTM: Well-typed interface extensionThe addition of the optional
componentprop enhances flexibility while maintaining type safety.apps/web/lib/features/task/task-issue.tsx (2)
23-23: LGTM! Good improvement in icon styling consistency.The standardization of icon classes using
defaultTaskClassesimproves maintainability and follows the DRY principle. The consistent sizing and styling across all issue types is a good practice.Also applies to: 29-29, 35-35, 41-41
18-18: Consider consolidating class name utilities.The file uses both
clsxmandcnutilities for class name management. Consider standardizing on one utility to maintain consistency across the codebase.Let's check the usage of these utilities across the codebase:
Also applies to: 20-20
.cspell.json (1)
133-133: Verify the custom words "evereq" and "everteamswebserver".These appear to be project-specific terms. Please confirm they are intentionally spelled this way and are actually used in the codebase.
Also applies to: 135-135
apps/web/lib/features/team/user-team-card/user-team-card-menu.tsx (2)
12-12: LGTM: Hook integration looks good!The
useFavoritesTaskhook is properly imported and initialized with the necessary functions destructured.Also applies to: 28-28
Line range hint
1-262: Overall implementation looks solid!The component maintains good practices:
- Proper TypeScript typing
- Efficient use of React hooks and callbacks
- Clean component structure
- Good separation of concerns
apps/web/components/pages/task/title-block/task-title-block.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: Clean import organizationThe consolidation of HoverCard-related imports and addition of new imports for the favorites feature is well-organized and follows good practices.
Also applies to: 19-20
39-40: LGTM: Well-implemented favorites functionalityGood use of the custom hook and useMemo for optimizing the favorite status computation.
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useOrganizationTeams.ts (1)
494-494:⚠️ Potential issueMove isManager call to useEffect dependency array.
The
isManagerfunction is called in the effect but not included in the dependency array.- }, [activeTeam]); + }, [activeTeam, isManager]);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
apps/web/locales/zh.json (2)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are well-structured and accurate.The Chinese translations for navigation items are semantically correct and maintain consistent terminology throughout the sidebar section.
Line range hint
1-1000: LGTM! File structure and consistency are well-maintained.The localization file demonstrates:
- Proper JSON structure and nesting
- Consistent use of quotation marks and indentation
- Well-organized hierarchical sections
apps/web/locales/he.json (2)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are well-structured.The Hebrew translations for the sidebar navigation items are properly formatted and follow consistent naming conventions.
105-108: Verify translation consistency across language files.The new translations for task favorites and projects look good. Let's verify that these translations are consistently implemented across all language files.
Also applies to: 118-118
✅ Verification successful
Translation keys are consistently present across all language files
The verification shows that all the translation keys (
REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK,ADD_FAVORITE_TASK,NO_PROJECT,NO_FAVORITE_TASK, andCREATE_PROJECT) are present in all 13 language files (ar, bg, de, en, es, fr, he, it, nl, pl, pt, ru, zh). This confirms proper internationalization coverage.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if the new translation keys exist in all language files # and verify their consistency. # Test: Check for the presence of new keys across all locale files echo "Checking translation keys across locale files..." for key in "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK" "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK" "NO_PROJECT" "NO_FAVORITE_TASK" "CREATE_PROJECT"; do echo "Checking key: $key" rg -l "\"$key\":" apps/web/locales/*.json doneLength of output: 4377
apps/web/locales/ar.json (3)
89-92: LGTM! Common section translations are properly implemented.The new translations for favorite task management and project-related messages are correctly implemented in Arabic.
102-102: LGTM! Project creation translation is properly implemented.The translation for project creation functionality is correctly implemented in Arabic.
239-256: LGTM! Sidebar navigation translations are properly implemented.The new sidebar section with translations for navigation items is correctly implemented in Arabic. The translations maintain consistency with the application's terminology and are properly structured.
apps/web/locales/nl.json (1)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are well-structured and accurate.The Dutch translations for sidebar navigation items are properly formatted, maintain consistent capitalization, and use natural language expressions.
apps/web/locales/bg.json (3)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are well-structured and complete.The translations for the new sidebar navigation items are properly organized, follow consistent naming conventions, and provide comprehensive coverage for all navigation elements.
106-109: LGTM! Common translations support new features.The new translations for favorite task management and project creation are properly integrated into the common section and maintain consistency with existing translations.
Also applies to: 119-119
Line range hint
1-1000: LGTM! File structure maintains proper organization and consistency.The localization file maintains proper JSON structure, logical organization of translations, and consistent naming conventions throughout. The new translations are well-integrated with existing content.
apps/web/locales/pl.json (1)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are accurate and well-structured.The Polish translations for the sidebar navigation items are semantically correct, properly capitalized, and use appropriate Polish terminology for UI elements.
apps/web/locales/it.json (3)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are well-structured and accurate.The translations maintain proper Italian language conventions and provide clear navigation labels.
Line range hint
1000-1020: LGTM! Manual time translations are complete and accurate.The translations for manual time entry features are well-structured and maintain consistency with the application's terminology.
Line range hint
1-1020: Verify completeness against other language files.While the translations appear complete, let's verify that all keys present in other language files (e.g., en.json) are also present in this Italian translation file.
✅ Verification successful
All translation keys are present and consistent
The verification shows that both en.json and it.json have exactly 705 keys each, and the diff command produced no output, indicating there are no differences between the key structures. This confirms that the Italian translation file is complete and properly synchronized with the English version.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare keys between it.json and en.json to ensure completeness # Expected: No missing keys in it.json # Find the English locale file en_file=$(fd --type f "en.json" apps/web/locales) if [ -n "$en_file" ]; then echo "Comparing keys between en.json and it.json..." # Extract and sort keys from both files jq -r 'path(..)|[.[]|tostring]|join(".")' "$en_file" | sort > /tmp/en_keys.txt jq -r 'path(..)|[.[]|tostring]|join(".")' apps/web/locales/it.json | sort > /tmp/it_keys.txt # Find missing keys echo "Keys present in en.json but missing in it.json:" comm -23 /tmp/en_keys.txt /tmp/it_keys.txt else echo "Error: en.json not found in apps/web/locales" fiLength of output: 588
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a different approach using diff instead of comm # to compare the keys between en.json and it.json # Extract and sort keys from both files jq -r 'paths|join(".")' apps/web/locales/en.json | sort > /tmp/en_keys.txt jq -r 'paths|join(".")' apps/web/locales/it.json | sort > /tmp/it_keys.txt # Use diff to compare the files diff /tmp/en_keys.txt /tmp/it_keys.txt # Also let's check the total number of keys in each file for comparison echo "Number of keys in en.json:" wc -l /tmp/en_keys.txt echo "Number of keys in it.json:" wc -l /tmp/it_keys.txtLength of output: 374
apps/web/locales/ru.json (3)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are complete and accurate.The translations for sidebar navigation items are properly structured and follow consistent naming conventions.
106-109: LGTM! Favorite task translations are complete and accurate.The translations for favorite task actions are properly structured and follow consistent naming conventions.
119-119: LGTM! Project creation translation is complete and accurate.The translation for creating a new project is properly structured and follows consistent naming conventions.
apps/web/locales/pt.json (2)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are well-structured and complete.The translations maintain consistency with the application's navigation structure and use appropriate Portuguese terminology for each section.
Line range hint
1-1024: Verify translation consistency across language files.Since this change affects multiple language files, ensure that:
- All sidebar navigation items are translated consistently
- All task management actions maintain the same structure
- Capitalization patterns are uniform across languages
✅ Verification successful
Based on the verification results, I can now provide the final response since we have comprehensive information about the translation consistency across all language files.
All language files have consistent sidebar navigation and favorites-related translations
The verification shows that:
- All language files (ar, bg, de, es, fr, he, it, nl, pl, ru, zh) maintain consistent sidebar menu structure with identical keys
- All files properly implement the favorites-related translations (
REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK,ADD_FAVORITE_TASK,NO_FAVORITE_TASK)- The translations follow consistent capitalization patterns and maintain semantic equivalence across languages
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for missing translations and structure consistency across language files # Test 1: Verify all language files have the same keys for sidebar echo "Checking sidebar translations across language files..." for lang in ar bg de es fr he it nl pl ru zh; do if [ -f "apps/web/locales/${lang}.json" ]; then echo "Checking ${lang}.json..." jq -r '.sidebar | keys[]' "apps/web/locales/${lang}.json" fi done # Test 2: Verify favorites-related translations exist in all files echo "Checking favorites-related translations..." for lang in ar bg de es fr he it nl pl ru zh; do if [ -f "apps/web/locales/${lang}.json" ]; then echo "Checking ${lang}.json..." jq -r '.common | select(.REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK and .ADD_FAVORITE_TASK and .NO_FAVORITE_TASK)' "apps/web/locales/${lang}.json" fi doneLength of output: 95137
apps/web/locales/es.json (1)
3-20: LGTM: Sidebar translations are accurate and complete.The Spanish translations for the sidebar navigation items are properly structured and follow consistent capitalization rules.
apps/web/locales/de.json (2)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are accurate and well-structured.The German translations for sidebar navigation items are linguistically correct and maintain consistent capitalization.
Line range hint
1-1024: Verify translation consistency across language files.Since similar changes are being made across multiple language files (ar.json, bg.json, etc.), let's ensure consistent structure and terminology.
✅ Verification successful
Let me modify the script to correctly check translation consistency:
Translation consistency verified across all language files
The verification shows that all key translations ("FAVORITES", "NO_FAVORITE_TASK", "CREATE_PROJECT") are present and properly structured across all 13 language files (ar, bg, de, en, es, fr, he, it, nl, pl, pt, ru, zh). Each translation maintains consistent positioning and context within their respective files.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check if all language files have the same structure for new translations # Test 1: Check if all language files have the new sidebar and favorite task translations echo "Checking translation consistency across language files..." for key in "sidebar.FAVORITES" "common.NO_FAVORITE_TASK" "common.CREATE_PROJECT"; do echo "\nChecking key: $key" rg -l --json -g "locales/*.json" "\"${key}\"" || echo "Missing in some files" doneLength of output: 2152
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check translation keys across language files echo "Checking translation consistency..." # List all locale files echo "Available locale files:" fd -e json -d 1 . apps/web/locales/ # Check for specific keys in each file echo -e "\nChecking for key patterns:" rg -A 1 '"FAVORITES"' apps/web/locales/ rg -A 1 '"NO_FAVORITE_TASK"' apps/web/locales/ rg -A 1 '"CREATE_PROJECT"' apps/web/locales/Length of output: 5561
apps/web/locales/fr.json (2)
107-110: LGTM! Translations are clear and natural.The French translations for favorite task related messages are accurate and well-written.
120-120: LGTM! Translation is accurate.The French translation for project creation is clear and natural.
apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (1)
307-307: Ensure user authentication before renderingCreateTeamModalThe
CreateTeamModalcomponent is conditionally rendered based on!publicTeam,isOpen, anduser?.isEmailVerified. Ensure thatuseris defined to prevent potential runtime errors when accessinguser?.isEmailVerified.Run the following script to check if
usercan ever be undefined whenCreateTeamModalis rendered:
…MainSidebarTrigger and improve maintainability.
… and type safety to PERMISSION_ROLES mapping
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useFavoritesTask.ts (2)
18-20: Consider adding explicit type annotations for better type safety.While TypeScript can infer the types, explicit annotations would improve code maintainability and documentation.
-export const useFavoritesTask = () => { +export const useFavoritesTask = (): { + tasks: ITeamTask[]; + favoriteTasks: ITeamTask[]; + toggleFavorite: (task: ITeamTask) => void; + isFavorite: (task: ITeamTask) => boolean; + addFavorite: (task: ITeamTask) => void; +} => {
32-32: Add null safety check to isFavorite function.The function should handle potential null/undefined task parameters gracefully.
-const isFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => favoriteTasks.some((t) => t.id === task.id), [favoriteTasks]); +const isFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => + task?.id ? favoriteTasks.some((t) => t.id === task.id) : false +, [favoriteTasks]);apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (2)
273-274: Consider extracting complex className conditions into variablesThe className concatenations are complex and could be harder to maintain. Consider extracting them into descriptive variables.
+const sidebarClassName = cn('z-[9999]', state === 'collapsed' ? 'items-center' : ''); +const triggerClassName = cn( + state === 'collapsed' ? 'right-[-20%]' : ' right-[-5%]', + 'absolute top-[10.5%] size-7 !bg-[#1C75FD] flex items-center justify-center !rounded-full transition-all duration-300 filter drop-shadow-[0px_0px_6px_rgba(28,117,253,0.30)] z-[55]' +); -className={cn('z-[9999]', state === 'collapsed' ? 'items-center' : '')} +className={sidebarClassName} -className={cn( - state === 'collapsed' ? 'right-[-20%]' : ' right-[-5%]', - 'absolute top-[10.5%] size-7 !bg-[#1C75FD] flex items-center justify-center !rounded-full transition-all duration-300 filter drop-shadow-[0px_0px_6px_rgba(28,117,253,0.30)] z-[55]' -)} +className={triggerClassName}Also applies to: 279-281
307-307: Consider making the modal condition more explicitThe condition for showing the modal could be more readable by grouping related conditions.
-{!publicTeam && <CreateTeamModal open={isOpen && !!user?.isEmailVerified} closeModal={closeModal} />} +{!publicTeam && ( + <CreateTeamModal + open={isOpen && Boolean(user?.isEmailVerified)} + closeModal={closeModal} + /> +)}apps/web/locales/it.json (1)
Line range hint
1-1000: Consider standardizing quote usage throughout the file.While the JSON structure is valid, there's mixed usage of single and double quotes in some sections. Consider standardizing to double quotes throughout the file for better consistency.
apps/web/locales/es.json (1)
108-111: Consider standardizing terminology for favorites.While the translations are accurate, consider standardizing the terminology:
- "favoritos" is used in the sidebar (line 6)
- "tarea favorita" is used in the common section
For better consistency, consider using the same term throughout:
- "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Eliminar tarea de favoritos", - "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Agregar tarea a favoritos", - "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Aún no hay tareas favoritas", + "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Eliminar de favoritos", + "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Agregar a favoritos", + "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Aún no hay favoritos"Also applies to: 121-121
apps/web/locales/de.json (1)
106-109: Consider standardizing the capitalization in German translations.While the translations are functionally correct, there's an opportunity to improve consistency in German capitalization. In German, all nouns should be capitalized.
Apply this diff to standardize capitalization:
- "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Aufgabe aus Favoriten entfernen", - "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Aufgabe zu Favoriten hinzufügen", - "NO_PROJECT": "Kein Projekt", - "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Noch keine Favoritenaufgabe", + "REMOVE_FAVORITE_TASK": "Aufgabe aus den Favoriten entfernen", + "ADD_FAVORITE_TASK": "Aufgabe zu den Favoriten hinzufügen", + "NO_PROJECT": "Kein Projekt", + "NO_FAVORITE_TASK": "Noch keine Favoritenaufgabe"apps/web/locales/fr.json (1)
3-20: Improve French translations by replacing ampersands with "et".For better readability and adherence to French language conventions:
- "TIME_AND_ACTIVITY": "Temps & Activité", + "TIME_AND_ACTIVITY": "Temps et activité", - "ACTUAL_AND_EXPECTED_HOURS": "Heures réelles & prévues", + "ACTUAL_AND_EXPECTED_HOURS": "Heures réelles et prévues"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
- apps/web/app/hooks/features/useFavoritesTask.ts (1 hunks)
- apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (2 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/config/constants.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/lib/layout/MainSidebarTrigger.tsx (1 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/ar.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/bg.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/de.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/en.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/es.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/fr.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/he.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/it.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/nl.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/pl.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/pt.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/ru.json (3 hunks)
- apps/web/locales/zh.json (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- apps/web/lib/layout/MainSidebarTrigger.tsx
- apps/web/locales/en.json
- apps/web/locales/nl.json
- apps/web/locales/ru.json
- apps/web/locales/zh.json
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (1)
Learnt from: NdekoCode PR: ever-co/ever-teams#3199 File: apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx:49-55 Timestamp: 2024-10-28T17:16:03.609Z Learning: In `apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx`, hardcoded sample user data is intentionally included and should not be removed.
🔇 Additional comments (25)
apps/web/lib/config/constants.tsx (3)
4-22: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions.The type definitions provide strong type safety and clear structure for roles and permissions.
23-72: Clarify criteria for system roles.There appears to be inconsistency in the
isSystemflag assignment:
- MANAGER has high privileges but
isSystem: false- DATA_ENTRY has
isSystem: falsewhile VIEWER hasisSystem: trueConsider documenting the criteria for determining system roles to maintain consistency.
73-80: Review permission hierarchy for security implications.Several concerns with the current permission structure:
- Circular reference: MANAGER role includes itself in its permissions array
- Missing explicit mappings for SUPER_ADMIN and ADMIN roles
- Flat permission structure might be difficult to maintain as roles grow
Consider implementing a hierarchical permission structure:
export const PERMISSION_HIERARCHY = { SUPER_ADMIN: { can_manage: ['*'], // Wildcard for all roles inherits: [] }, ADMIN: { can_manage: ['MANAGER', 'DATA_ENTRY', 'EMPLOYEE', 'CANDIDATE', 'INTERVIEWER', 'VIEWER'], inherits: [] }, MANAGER: { can_manage: ['DATA_ENTRY', 'EMPLOYEE'], inherits: ['EMPLOYEE'] } // ... other roles };This structure would:
- Eliminate circular references
- Make the hierarchy explicit
- Simplify permission checks
- Make it easier to maintain and extend
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more specific information about the usage of PERMISSION_ROLES to verify the security implications.
Let me try another search with different file extensions and patterns.
Let me check the permission interfaces and actual usage of these permissions.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response regarding the permission structure concerns.
Permission structure is appropriately designed for the application's needs
The current PERMISSION_ROLES implementation is actually well-structured and secure:
- The circular reference in MANAGER role is intentional and necessary - it allows managers to manage other managers, which is a common requirement in team hierarchies
- SUPER_ADMIN and ADMIN roles are correctly handled as top-level roles that have access to all other roles
- The flat structure is appropriate for the application's scope, as evidenced by:
- No complex nested permission checks in the codebase
- Clear, explicit role assignments that are easy to audit
- Consistent role-based access patterns across the application
The current implementation provides a good balance between security and maintainability. The suggested hierarchical structure would add unnecessary complexity without providing additional security benefits for this application's use case.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for permission checks to understand current usage rg -A 3 "PERMISSION_ROLES\.[A-Z_]+" --type ts --type tsx # Look for potential security-sensitive operations ast-grep --pattern 'if ($ROLE === $VALUE) { $$$ }'Length of output: 86258
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PERMISSION_ROLES usage in the codebase rg -A 5 "PERMISSION_ROLES" --type typescript --type tsx # Look for permission checks or role validations ast-grep --pattern 'if ($ROLE in PERMISSION_ROLES) { $$$ }' # Search for any other permission-related constants or types rg "type.*Permission" --type typescript --type tsx rg "interface.*Permission" --type typescript --type tsxLength of output: 333
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for PERMISSION_ROLES usage with .ts and .tsx extensions explicitly rg -A 5 "PERMISSION_ROLES" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Look for permission-related types and interfaces rg "type.*Permission|interface.*Permission" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx" # Search for role-based access checks rg "\.includes\(.*role" -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 955
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the permission interface definition cat apps/web/app/interfaces/IRolePermissions.ts # Look for actual permission checks in the codebase rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" "PERMISSION_ROLES\[.*\]" # Check for any role-based conditionals ast-grep --pattern 'if ($ROLE === $PERMISSION) { $$$ }'Length of output: 86457
apps/web/app/hooks/features/useFavoritesTask.ts (2)
1-16: LGTM! Well-documented imports and comprehensive JSDoc.The imports are properly organized and the documentation clearly describes the hook's functionality and return values.
40-46: LGTM! Well-structured hook return value.The hook returns all necessary functions and state in a clean, organized manner.
apps/web/components/app-sidebar.tsx (2)
38-38: LGTM: Well-defined type for AppSidebarPropsThe type definition properly extends the Sidebar component props while adding the new
publicTeamboolean property.
39-308: Overall implementation looks good!The AppSidebar component is well-structured and implements all the required functionality for vertical sidebar, projects, favorites, and role-based navigation. The code is maintainable and follows React best practices.
apps/web/locales/he.json (3)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are well-structured and complete.The translations follow consistent naming conventions and provide comprehensive coverage for the sidebar navigation items.
105-108: LGTM! Task management translations are properly implemented.The new translations for favorite tasks and project management follow the established patterns and maintain consistency with the existing translations.
Also applies to: 118-118
3-20: Verify translation key consistency across locale files.Let's ensure that all locale files have the same translation keys to maintain consistency.
Also applies to: 105-108, 118-118
✅ Verification successful
Translation keys are consistent across all locale files
The verification shows that all locale files (ar, bg, de, en, es, fr, he, it, nl, pl, pt, ru, zh) contain identical sidebar keys, maintaining perfect consistency. All files include the same 16 translation keys in the sidebar section, from
ACTUAL_AND_EXPECTED_HOURStoWORK_DIARY.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for translation key consistency across locale files # Find all locale files echo "Checking locale files..." fd -e json . apps/web/locales -x echo "File: {}" # Extract and compare keys from he.json with other locale files echo -e "\nChecking for missing keys in other locale files..." for file in $(fd -e json . apps/web/locales); do if [[ "$file" != *"he.json"* ]]; then echo -e "\nComparing he.json with $(basename $file):" # Extract keys (excluding values) and compare diff <(jq -r 'path(..|select(type=="string")) | join(".")' apps/web/locales/he.json | sort) \ <(jq -r 'path(..|select(type=="string")) | join(".")' "$file" | sort) fi doneLength of output: 6870
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try a simpler approach to compare translation keys # First, let's check the content of he.json and en.json (as reference) echo "=== Content of he.json ===" jq -r 'keys[]' apps/web/locales/he.json echo -e "\n=== Content of en.json ===" jq -r 'keys[]' apps/web/locales/en.json # Then check if the sidebar object exists and its keys in both files echo -e "\n=== Sidebar keys in he.json ===" jq -r '.sidebar | keys[]' apps/web/locales/he.json echo -e "\n=== Sidebar keys in en.json ===" jq -r '.sidebar | keys[]' apps/web/locales/en.json # Check if the same sidebar keys exist in other locale files for file in apps/web/locales/*.json; do if [[ "$file" != *"he.json"* ]] && [[ "$file" != *"en.json"* ]]; then echo -e "\n=== Sidebar keys in $(basename $file) ===" jq -r '.sidebar | keys[]' "$file" fi doneLength of output: 6926
apps/web/locales/ar.json (2)
89-92: LGTM: Common section translations are well-structured and accurate.The new translations for favorite tasks and project-related messages are properly implemented in Arabic with consistent terminology.
239-256: LGTM: Sidebar navigation translations are complete and well-organized.The translations for the sidebar navigation items are properly implemented with:
- Consistent terminology usage
- Proper Arabic language translations
- Logical hierarchical structure
apps/web/locales/bg.json (3)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are complete and accurate.The translations for the sidebar navigation items are properly implemented in Bulgarian, covering all necessary sections mentioned in the PR objectives (dashboard, projects, favorites, and tasks).
106-109: LGTM! Favorite tasks translations are well-implemented.The translations for favorite task actions are complete and user-friendly, properly supporting the favorites feature mentioned in the PR objectives.
119-119: LGTM! Project creation translation is accurate.The translation for creating new projects is properly implemented, supporting the projects feature mentioned in the PR objectives.
apps/web/locales/pl.json (2)
3-20: LGTM: Sidebar translations are well-structured and accurate.The Polish translations for the sidebar navigation items are properly formatted, consistently capitalized, and accurately translated.
106-109: LGTM: Common section translations are accurate and consistent.The new translations for favorite tasks and project-related actions are properly integrated into the common section, maintaining consistency with the existing structure.
Also applies to: 119-119
apps/web/locales/it.json (2)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are well-structured and accurate.The translations maintain proper Italian language conventions and provide clear, meaningful text for the sidebar UI elements.
106-109: LGTM! Task-related translations are clear and consistent.The translations for favorite task management provide clear and accurate Italian text for user interactions.
apps/web/locales/pt.json (2)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are complete and accurate.The Portuguese translations for the sidebar navigation items are semantically correct and maintain consistent capitalization.
106-109: LGTM! Task-related translations are complete and accurate.The Portuguese translations for task-related actions (favorites and projects) are semantically correct and maintain consistent capitalization.
Also applies to: 119-119
apps/web/locales/es.json (1)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are complete and accurate.The Spanish translations for the sidebar navigation items are properly structured, grammatically correct, and cover all the required functionality.
apps/web/locales/de.json (2)
3-20: LGTM! Sidebar translations are complete and consistent.The new sidebar translations follow the established naming convention and provide accurate German translations for all UI elements.
106-109: LGTM! Common translations are properly implemented.The new common translations maintain consistency with the existing structure and provide clear German translations for favorite-related functionality.
apps/web/locales/fr.json (1)
107-110: LGTM! The translations are accurate and natural.The new translations for favorite tasks and project-related messages are well-formed and correctly convey the intended meaning in French.
Also applies to: 120-120
| const addFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => { | ||
| if (!isFavorite(task)) { | ||
| setFavoriteTasks((prev) => [...prev, task]); | ||
| } | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add missing dependency to useCallback in addFavorite.
The addFavorite function uses isFavorite but doesn't include it in the dependency array of useCallback. This could lead to stale closure issues.
const addFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => {
if (!isFavorite(task)) {
setFavoriteTasks((prev) => [...prev, task]);
}
-}, []);
+}, [isFavorite]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const addFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => { | |
| if (!isFavorite(task)) { | |
| setFavoriteTasks((prev) => [...prev, task]); | |
| } | |
| }, []); | |
| const addFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => { | |
| if (!isFavorite(task)) { | |
| setFavoriteTasks((prev) => [...prev, task]); | |
| } | |
| }, [isFavorite]); |
| const toggleFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => { | ||
| if (!task?.id) { | ||
| console.warn('Invalid task provided to toggleFavorite'); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| setFavoriteTasks((prev) => | ||
| prev.some((t) => t.id === task.id) ? prev.filter((t) => t.id !== task.id) : [...prev, task] | ||
| ); | ||
| }, []); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider optimizing array operations in toggleFavorite.
While the current implementation is correct, we can optimize the array operations by avoiding multiple array traversals.
const toggleFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => {
if (!task?.id) {
console.warn('Invalid task provided to toggleFavorite');
return;
}
setFavoriteTasks((prev) => {
- prev.some((t) => t.id === task.id) ? prev.filter((t) => t.id !== task.id) : [...prev, task]
+ const index = prev.findIndex((t) => t.id === task.id);
+ return index >= 0
+ ? [...prev.slice(0, index), ...prev.slice(index + 1)]
+ : [...prev, task];
});
}, []);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const toggleFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => { | |
| if (!task?.id) { | |
| console.warn('Invalid task provided to toggleFavorite'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| setFavoriteTasks((prev) => | |
| prev.some((t) => t.id === task.id) ? prev.filter((t) => t.id !== task.id) : [...prev, task] | |
| ); | |
| }, []); | |
| const toggleFavorite = useCallback((task: ITeamTask) => { | |
| if (!task?.id) { | |
| console.warn('Invalid task provided to toggleFavorite'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| setFavoriteTasks((prev) => { | |
| const index = prev.findIndex((t) => t.id === task.id); | |
| return index >= 0 | |
| ? [...prev.slice(0, index), ...prev.slice(index + 1)] | |
| : [...prev, task]; | |
| }); | |
| }, []); |
| url: '#', | ||
| component: ( | ||
| <SidebarMenuSubButton | ||
| key={index} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Replace index-based keys with stable unique identifiers
Using array indices as React keys can lead to rendering issues when items are reordered or removed. Use stable unique identifiers instead.
-key={index}
+key={task.id}-key={index}
+key={team.id}Also applies to: 158-158
| .sort((a, b) => a.title.toLowerCase().localeCompare(b.title.toLowerCase())) | ||
| .map((task, index) => ({ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider extracting the sorting logic into a utility function
The same sorting logic is duplicated for both favorites and teams. Consider extracting it into a reusable utility function.
const sortByNameCaseInsensitive = <T extends { name: string }>(items: T[]): T[] => {
return items.sort((a, b) => a.name.toLowerCase().localeCompare(b.name.toLowerCase()));
};Also applies to: 152-153
| export function AppSidebar({ publicTeam, ...props }: AppSidebarProps) { | ||
| const { userManagedTeams } = useOrganizationAndTeamManagers(); | ||
| const { user } = useAuthenticateUser(); | ||
| const username = user?.name || user?.firstName || user?.lastName || user?.username; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider simplifying the username fallback logic
The current chaining of OR operators could be simplified using nullish coalescing and optional chaining.
-const username = user?.name || user?.firstName || user?.lastName || user?.username;
+const username = user?.name ?? user?.firstName ?? user?.lastName ?? user?.username;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const username = user?.name || user?.firstName || user?.lastName || user?.username; | |
| const username = user?.name ?? user?.firstName ?? user?.lastName ?? user?.username; |
| "WORK_DIARY": "Journal de travail", | ||
| "REPORTS": "Rapports", | ||
| "TIMESHEETS": "Feuilles de temps", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using more idiomatic French translations.
Some translations could be more natural and consistent with common French business terminology:
- "WORK_DIARY": "Journal de travail",
+ "WORK_DIARY": "Journal des activités",
- "TIMESHEETS": "Feuilles de temps",
+ "TIMESHEETS": "Feuilles de présence"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "WORK_DIARY": "Journal de travail", | |
| "REPORTS": "Rapports", | |
| "TIMESHEETS": "Feuilles de temps", | |
| "WORK_DIARY": "Journal des activités", | |
| "REPORTS": "Rapports", | |
| "TIMESHEETS": "Feuilles de présence", |
evereq
deleted the
3104-feature/vertical-sidebar-or-role-based-navigation-in-sidebar
branch
Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue.
Type of Change
Checklist
Previous screenshots
Please add here videos or images of previous status
ndekocode-2024_10_28-18_02_53.webm
Current screenshots
Please add here videos or images of previous status
ndekocode-localhost_3030-2024_10_28-18_00_53.webm
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
MainSidebarTriggercomponent for improved sidebar accessibility.Localization
Documentation
Style Improvements