Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bird-watcher: add "for loop" concept #1775

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Oct 31, 2021

Conversation

sachinmk27
Copy link
Contributor

@sachinmk27 sachinmk27 commented Oct 3, 2021

Fixes: #1617

  1. Updated config.json with concept and concept exercise
  2. Added concept exercise directory with minimum valid spec
  3. Added concept directory with about, introduction.

@junedev junedev marked this pull request as draft October 3, 2021 09:32
@junedev
Copy link
Member

junedev commented Oct 3, 2021

I marked this as a draft PR. Click on "ready for review" to when you are ready to change it back to a normal PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@jmrunkle jmrunkle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Many of the documentation comments also need to be applied to the concept and exercise introduction.md files, but I only commented on about.md.

concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/about.md Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/instructions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/instructions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/instructions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/instructions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.meta/config.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jmrunkle jmrunkle added september-sprint status/awaiting-contributor This pull request is waiting on the contributor. labels Oct 3, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ErikSchierboom ErikSchierboom left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for working on this

concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/bird_watcher.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/introduction.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jmrunkle
Copy link
Contributor

jmrunkle commented Oct 7, 2021

@sachinmk27 - any chance you will have time to work on this? This is also blocking ErikSchierboom's new exercise interest-is-interesting (unless we remove the prerequisite and add it later).

@sachinmk27
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jmrunkle Unfortunately I will not be able to make time for the next 4-5 days. Kindly reassign it since it's already delayed.

@jmrunkle
Copy link
Contributor

jmrunkle commented Oct 8, 2021

@ErikSchierboom mind waiting? Or perhaps you want to skip adding the prereq until this can be completed?

I'm not particularly motivated to find another contributer if we are ok waiting a bit longer.

@ErikSchierboom
Copy link
Member

@jmrunkle I don't mind waiting, and I don't mind removing the prerequisite for the moment. @junedev what would your preference be?

@junedev
Copy link
Member

junedev commented Oct 11, 2021

@ErikSchierboom I would remove the prerequisite and put the other exercise live.

@sachinmk27 Could you clarify whether you would like to finish this later on when you have time or whether we should ask someone else to take over?

@sachinmk27
Copy link
Contributor Author

@junedev I want to finish it. And I will be able to work on it starting today.

@junedev
Copy link
Member

junedev commented Oct 30, 2021

@sachinmk27 Could you give me an update again whether you want to finish this PR or whether we should re-assign the task?

@sachinmk27
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pls reassign the task. Sorry, I couldn't make time for it.

@andrerfcsantos
Copy link
Member

Pls reassign the task. Sorry, I couldn't make time for it.

No worries, thanks for letting us know :)

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Dear sachinmk27

Thank you for contributing to the Go track on Exercism! 💙
You will see some automated feedback below 🤖. It would be great if you can make sure your PR covers those points. This will save your reviewer some time and your change can be merged quicker.

  • 📜 The following files usually contain very similar content.

    • concepts/<concept>/about.md
    • concepts/<concept>/introduction.md
    • exercises/concept/<exercise>/.docs/introduction.md

    Please check whether the changes you made to one of these also need to be applied to the others.

  • 🧦 If you changed the function signature or the function comment in the exemplar file or the sub file (<exercise>.go), make sure the change is applied to both files.

  • ✍️ If your PR is not related to an existing issue (and is not self-explaining like a typo fix), please make sure the description explains why the change you made is necessary.

  • 🔤 If your PR fixes an easy to identify typo, if would be great if you could check for that typo in the whole repo. For example, if you found Unicdoe, use "replace all" in your editor (or command line magic) to fix it consistently.

Dear Reviewer/Maintainer

  • 📏 Make sure you set the appropriate x:size label for the PR. (This also works after merging, in case you forgot about it.)

  • 🔍 Don't be too nit-picky. If the PR is a clear improvement compared to the status quo, it should be approved as clear signal this is good to be merged even if the minor comments you might have are not addressed by the contributor. Further improvement ideas can be captured in issues (if important enough) and implemented via additional PRs.

  • 🤔 After reviewing the diff in the "Files changed" section, take a moment to think about whether there are changes missing from the diff. Does something need to be adjusted in other places so the code or content stays consistent?

Automated comment created by PR Commenter 🤖.

sachinmk27 and others added 2 commits October 31, 2021 11:44
1. Update config.json with concept and concept exercise
2. Add concept exercise directory with minimum valid spec
3. Add concept directory with about, introduction.
Co-authored-by: Jason Runkle <jmrunkle@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Erik Schierboom <erik_schierboom@hotmail.com>
@andrerfcsantos andrerfcsantos marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2021 13:30
@andrerfcsantos andrerfcsantos marked this pull request as draft October 31, 2021 13:35
@andrerfcsantos andrerfcsantos marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2021 16:07
@andrerfcsantos andrerfcsantos changed the title bird-watcher: Initial commit bird-watcher: add "for loop" concept Oct 31, 2021
@andrerfcsantos andrerfcsantos requested a review from a team October 31, 2021 19:00
Copy link
Member

@junedev junedev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some ideas for improvement.

concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/.meta/config.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
concepts/for-loops/about.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/instructions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/.docs/instructions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/bird_watcher.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/bird_watcher_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exercises/concept/bird-watcher/bird_watcher_test.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: June <12543047+junedev@users.noreply.github.com>
@junedev
Copy link
Member

junedev commented Oct 31, 2021

@andrerfcsantos I only reviewed about.md so fixes you do there need to be applied to the other files as well. ... you probably know the drill. 😉

@andrerfcsantos andrerfcsantos force-pushed the bird-watcher branch 4 times, most recently from 4dfb4f0 to 830c586 Compare October 31, 2021 20:44
@andrerfcsantos
Copy link
Member

@junedev Gotcha. Ready to review again.

@junedev junedev dismissed jmrunkle’s stale review October 31, 2021 21:40

code was updated

@junedev
Copy link
Member

junedev commented Oct 31, 2021

@andrerfcsantos The only thing left is this comment: #1775 (comment)
I approved so you can merge yourself after that last fix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status/awaiting-contributor This pull request is waiting on the contributor. x:size/large Large amount of work
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

for-loops: Port "Bird Watcher" exercise from JS or C#
5 participants