chore(bindings): add tooling to generate docsrs_bindings.rs

[Xenira]

Refs: #443

[ptondereau]

Great work BTW! It was a struggle point in the past 😅

[Xenira]

Great work BTW! It was a struggle point in the past 😅

Thanks. Yeah came up a lot 🫤

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15618572899

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 21.105%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 15596794337:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	829
Relevant Lines:	3928

---

💛 - Coveralls

[Qard]

I think this might have an architecture problem. I updated #442, #444 and #445 with it and all had a few slight changes which appear to be unrelated to the PR changes and look an awful lot like architectural differences--differently sized types, mainly.

[Xenira]

I think this might have an architecture problem. I updated #442, #444 and #445 with it and all had a few slight changes which appear to be unrelated to the PR changes and look an awful lot like architectural differences--differently sized types, mainly.

@Qard Yes, you are right. Can you try adding a --platform linux/amd64 to the docker build command in tools/update_bindings.sh. In my testing I got the same diff as you when building for arm.

[Qard]

Yep, that appears to do it. I pushed an update to #444 which includes that change and the bindings look correct now. 🙂