Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(#9498): refactor endCurrentTransform #9500

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

ShaMan123
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaMan123 ShaMan123 commented Nov 19, 2023

Motivation

closes #9498

Description

I encountered an exception thrown by fabric when using _discardActiveObject => endCurrentTransform w/o passing the e param which was typed as optional in _discardActiveObject but was not in endCurrentTransform/modified event.
Types were wrong, that is why we missed it.
I had to refactor some code and that made some cleanup possible.

Changes

  • squashed _finalizeCurrentTransform => endCurrentTransform and moved from Canvas to SelectableCanvas
  • exposed FabricObject#isTransforming(action)
  • rm _scaling flag: blame point to 20a87c6#diff-8eca4d2c9c7324551d9e6a7ce3817a987c9d598332b3f2f6ab02d2f1c98cde4fR1033 - not used by fabric => isTransforming('scale') can be used instead
  • rm isMoving => isTransforming('drag') is used instead
  • refactor _handleEvent to support passing a custom object needed for mouse up after _currentTransform has been nullified

Gist

In Action

@ShaMan123 ShaMan123 requested a review from asturur November 19, 2023 10:49
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 19, 2023

Build Stats

file / KB (diff) bundled minified
fabric 907.037 (-0.524) 304.937 (+0.231)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@ShaMan123 ShaMan123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me, let's see what tests have to say

};

target.setCoords();
this._currentTransform = null;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is a change done when sqaushing _finalizeCurrentTransform requiring a bit more work to adapt mouse up logic

@asturur
Copy link
Member

asturur commented Nov 20, 2023

Somehow it was working in javascript before.
Can we make the 'e' part of the event optional without any refactor?
I understand how the bug was introduced, but i need to dig deeper on what are the side effects.

@asturur
Copy link
Member

asturur commented Nov 20, 2023

Where is the exception thrown?
My understanding is that e will be undefined in the event handler, and so developer code will eventually thrown.
Or is fabric throwing by itself?

@ShaMan123
Copy link
Contributor Author

You understand correctly

@ShaMan123
Copy link
Contributor Author

ShaMan123 commented Nov 20, 2023

stack call drill down:
_discardActiveObject
endCurrentTransform
_finalizeCurrentTransform
fire modified event - throws e is not defined

I can do a patch that is not as clean as this and PR this on top. Should I?

@ShaMan123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually I think not because the only change needed is in types making e optional in the modified event

@ShaMan123 ShaMan123 changed the title fix(#9498): exception due to wrong type fix(#9498): exception due to wrong type, refactor endCurrentTransform Nov 27, 2023
@asturur
Copy link
Member

asturur commented Dec 11, 2023

Sorry i completely forgot about this on.
I wanted exactly to ask if we can just make the type optional and just write over it that the only case we know in which the event is missing is when we call endTransform by code and not by user actions?

@ShaMan123
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry i completely forgot about this on. I wanted exactly to ask if we can just make the type optional and just write over it that the only case we know in which the event is missing is when we call endTransform by code and not by user actions?

I don't understand what you suggest. Isn't that this PR? Are you missing a comment in the code?

Copy link
Contributor

Coverage after merging fix-9498 into master will be

82.80%

Coverage Report
FileStmtsBranchesFuncsLinesUncovered Lines
index.node.ts7.69%100%0%14.29%17, 20, 23, 35, 38, 41
src
   ClassRegistry.ts100%100%100%100%
   Collection.ts94.85%94.83%87.10%97.14%109, 112, 215–216, 241–242
   CommonMethods.ts96.55%87.50%100%100%9
   Intersection.ts100%100%100%100%
   Observable.ts87.76%85.29%87.50%89.58%134–135, 160–161, 32–33, 41, 50, 78, 89
   Point.ts100%100%100%100%
   Shadow.ts98.36%95.65%100%100%178
   cache.ts97.06%90%100%100%57
   config.ts74.14%65%66.67%82.76%131, 139, 139, 139, 139, 139–141, 152–154, 30
   constants.ts100%100%100%100%
src/LayoutManager
   LayoutManager.ts87.50%89.29%76.92%90%133–134, 136–137, 137, 137, 137, 137, 231, 289–290, 301, 46
   constants.ts100%100%100%100%
src/LayoutManager/LayoutStrategies
   ClipPathLayout.ts82.05%72.22%100%88.89%30–31, 42, 54, 57–58, 65
   FitContentLayout.ts100%100%100%100%
   FixedLayout.ts20%0%0%40%20–21, 23, 23, 23, 23, 23
   LayoutStrategy.ts86%64.71%100%96.15%36, 43, 43, 43, 51, 71–72
   utils.ts91.67%85.71%100%100%28, 34
src/Pattern
   Pattern.ts90.54%93.94%80%90.32%119, 130, 139, 32, 36
src/brushes
   BaseBrush.ts100%100%100%100%
   CircleBrush.ts0%0%0%0%108, 108, 108, 110, 112, 114–116, 118–121, 128–129, 13, 136, 138, 23–24, 32–36, 40–44, 51–54, 62–66, 68, 76, 76, 76, 76, 76–77, 79, 79, 79–82, 84, 92–93, 95, 97–99
   PatternBrush.ts97.06%87.50%100%100%21
   PencilBrush.ts91.06%82.35%100%93.81%122–123, 152, 152–154, 176, 176, 276, 280, 285–286, 68–69, 84–85
   SprayBrush.ts0%0%0%0%107, 107, 107, 107, 107–108, 110–111, 118–119, 121, 123–127, 136, 140–141, 141, 148, 148, 148–151, 153–156, 160–161, 163, 165–168, 17, 171, 178–179, 18, 181, 183–184, 186, 193–194, 196–197, 20, 200, 200, 207, 207, 21, 211, 22, 22, 22–24, 28, 32, 39, 46, 53, 60, 67, 84–86, 94–96, 98–99
src/canvas
   Canvas.ts78.67%77.09%82.46%79.29%1011–1013, 1016–1017, 1021–1022, 1133–1135, 1138–1139, 1212, 1324, 1444, 158, 183, 289, 289–294, 299, 322–323, 328–333, 353, 353, 353–354, 354, 354–355, 363, 368–369, 369, 369–370, 372, 381, 387–388, 388, 388, 42, 431, 439, 443, 443, 443–444, 446, 46, 528–529, 529, 529–530, 536, 536, 536–538, 558, 560, 560, 560–561, 561, 561, 564, 564, 564–565, 568, 577–578, 580–581, 583, 583–584, 586–587, 599–600, 600, 600–601, 603–608, 614, 621, 658, 658, 658, 660, 662–667, 673, 679, 679, 679–680, 682, 685, 690, 703, 731, 783–784, 784, 784, 784, 784, 784, 787–788, 791, 791–793, 796–797, 877, 884, 884, 884, 894, 923, 938–939, 939, 939–941, 944–945, 945, 945, 947, 955, 955, 955–957, 957, 957, 964–965, 973–974, 974, 974–975, 981, 983
   CanvasOptions.ts100%100%100%100%
   SelectableCanvas.ts93.17%91.27%94.44%94.44%1033, 1041, 1152, 1154, 1156–1157, 1226–1227, 461–462, 464–465, 465, 465, 514–515, 591, 596, 646, 648–649, 695, 700–701, 728–729, 789–790, 795–799, 801, 960, 960–961, 964, 984, 984
   StaticCanvas.ts96.53%93.09%98.92%98.29%1019, 1029, 1080–1082, 1085, 1120–1121, 1197, 1206, 1206, 1210, 1210, 1257–1258, 178–179, 195, 559, 571–572, 902–903, 903, 903–904
   StaticCanvasOptions.ts100%100%100%100%
   TextEditingManager.ts86%71.43%91.67%91.67%17, 17, 17–18, 18, 18
src/canvas/DOMManagers
   CanvasDOMManager.ts95.52%70%100%100%21–22, 29
   StaticCanvasDOMManager.ts97.50%88.89%100%100%33
   util.ts86.67%80.56%83.33%93.94%14, 26, 63–64, 67, 67, 74, 93–94
src/color
   Color.ts94.96%91.67%96.30%96.05%233, 258–259, 267–268, 48
   color_map.ts100%100%100%100%
   constants.ts100%100%100%100%
   util.ts85.71%76.92%100%89.74%55–56, 56, 58, 58, 58–59, 61–62, 89
src/controls
   Control.ts94.44%93.10%91.67%96.77%183, 249, 354
   changeWidth.ts100%100%100%100%
   commonControls.ts100%100%100%100%
   controlRendering.ts81.63%78%100%84.78%106, 111, 121, 121, 45, 50, 61, 61, 65–72, 81–82
   drag.ts100%100%100%100%
   fireEvent.ts88.89%75%100%100%13
   polyControl.ts10.87%0%0%16.13%114, 114, 114, 114, 114, 116–119, 119, 122, 129, 24–26, 50–52, 58–59, 61, 71, 77–79, 79, 81, 84, 86, 90–92, 94, 99
   rotate.ts19.57%12.50%50%21.43%41, 45, 51, 51, 51–52, 55–57, 59, 59, 59, 59, 59–61, 61, 61–63, 65, 65, 65–67, 67, 67–68, 73, 73,

@asturur
Copy link
Member

asturur commented Jan 14, 2024

we fix the type issue with this: #9596
Then when you can expand on why the other refactors are necessary or better or needed for some other bug we can evaluate the other changes as well

@asturur asturur changed the title fix(#9498): exception due to wrong type, refactor endCurrentTransform fix(#9498): refactor endCurrentTransform Jan 14, 2024
@asturur asturur changed the title fix(#9498): refactor endCurrentTransform refactor(#9498): refactor endCurrentTransform Jan 14, 2024
@ShaMan123 ShaMan123 added the stale Issue marked as stale by the stale bot label May 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
stale Issue marked as stale by the stale bot
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

endCurrentTransform severe bug
2 participants