-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 943
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore: remove disturbing image from README #1782
Conversation
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## next #1782 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.64% 99.64%
=======================================
Files 2340 2340
Lines 242654 242654
Branches 1110 1110
=======================================
Hits 241802 241802
Misses 831 831
Partials 21 21 |
I had to reload the page on FF-mobile private mode to get the bad one. So I'm not exactly sure, what actually is the condition for getting the image, but I get it on different devices, OSes, browsers on the first and subsequent visits. |
I am getting it too :) |
PS: Github was showing me 500, which lead to 3 approvals :D |
Maybe contact the creator of LoremFlickr https://github.com/MastaBaba also? It looks like it pulls images directly from the Flickr API rather than a fixed set of images, which seems risky, as there's nothing to prevent a badly tagged disturbing image on Flickr from creeping into the results. https://github.com/MastaBaba/LoremFlickr-2 So I would agree to remove loremflickr as a provider, seems too much like a potential pitfall. |
There is something really weird Did we somehow got hacked? How is this even possible? The input for this was Line 106 in 2b84b33
So just |
🤯 More and more I assume we got somehow hacked! In worst case the new image we are now showing will be hacked as well in the same way... |
From the linked article I get the impression that Github caches external images when they md2html that page (once). Edit: since the cache purge solved this, I assume it has been bad luck. |
Why and how do you get that impression?! You even provided a documentation source that states why that (the content tag) happens.
Now you are overdramatizing. It's bad luck. For someone maintaining a library which is all about odds I'm a bit disappointed hearing such statements. |
If you do a reverse image search you can see that image is on Flickr So my guess is
|
Very interesting We should still message the Flickr author later on then |
maybe could add a warning in the documentation like "The images are fetched from an external service outside the control of Faker, and could occasionally contain URLs which point to unexpected or offensive images." |
Let's continue the discussion here: #1783 |
The image shown on the README is disturbing and needs to be removed ASAP.
Screenshot (Click to show)
The image is static and no longer random.
I assume this is intentional from loremflickr to prevent the usage on github.Correction: Github Image Cache + Bad Luck
Reproducible in Firefox (normal, mobile and private mode), Chrome.
I also consider removing loremflickr from our image providers entirely, since having that image in a presentation with a customer is an absolute no go 🙅 .