-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding explanatory text to emissions-eu-trends.md #23
Conversation
6f58176
to
8b9bce6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mostly minor, but several substantial mistranslations by deepL in cases where the sentence structure is tricky.
cheers!
|
||
* __Energy:__ Emissions from the energy sector fell by 39% compared to 1990 to 972 million tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub>eq per year. Emissions from the energy sector began to decline significantly after 2007. In recent years we have seen a more rapid decline, which can be expected to continue in the future, given the EU's commitment to achieving <glossary id="co2eq">climate neutrality</glossary> by 2050. | ||
Emissions in the energy sector come primarily from electricity and heat production. These emissions can be reduced through energy savings and the development of renewable and low-carbon energy sources. They also come from leakages from fuel extraction, fuel production and treatment and oil processing. | ||
* __Transport:__ Transport emissions increased by 33% compared to 1990 to 968 million tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub>eq per year. The detailed graph on the right shows a temporary drop in emissions after 2007 due to the global financial crisis and the subsequent economic recession. Since 2013, emissions can be seen to have risen again. GHG emissions from transport are primarily from the combustion of fossil fuels in the engines of road transport vehicles. (In 2019, 81% of all emissions from the transport sector were from transport, with aviation accounting for 15%.) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
-
add comma:
from
Transport emissions increased by 33% compared to 1990 to 968 million tonnes of CO2eq per year.
to
Transport emissions increased by 33% compared to 1990, to 968 million tonnes of CO2eq per year. -
shorten:
from
Since 2013, emissions can be seen to have risen again.
to
Since 2013, emissions have risen again. -
IMPORTANT:
Change
In 2019, 81% of all emissions from the transport sector were from transport, with aviation accounting for 15%.
to
In 2019, 81% of all emissions from the transport sector were from road transport, with aviation accounting for 15%.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I covered:
- Added comma
- Shortened the sentence.
- Updated to "road transport". (IMPORTANT)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tjarnikova as this comment one is marked with "IMPORTANT", I will leave it open for you to resolve.
* __Combustion in industry and construction:__ Emissions fell by 41% to 429 million tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub>eq in 2019. Emissions come from the combustion of fossil fuels for industrial use, typically when something needs to be heated in production (during melting, drying, distillation, etc.). | ||
For example, emissions from combustion in heavy industry (iron and steel production) have halved by 2019. | ||
* __Agriculture:__ Emissions from the agricultural sector have fallen by 21% since 1990 to 382 million tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub>eq per year. Emissions come mainly from livestock farming and soil cultivation and associated N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. | ||
Reducing methane emissions from agriculture would lead to a reduction in the number of livestock kept (and the associated reduction in the consumption of beef and dairy products), a change in the management of manure (for example, by stabilising it in biogas plants) and less intensive fertiliser application. However, reducing livestock farming can also harm soil quality, availability of natural fertiliser, etc. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMPORTANT - mistranslation:
change
Reducing methane emissions from agriculture would lead to a reduction in the number of livestock kept (and the associated reduction in the consumption of beef and dairy products), a change in the management of manure (for example, by stabilising it in biogas plants) and less intensive fertiliser application. However, reducing livestock farming can also harm soil quality, availability of natural fertiliser, etc.
to
Measures that would lead to a reduction in methane emissions from agriculture include a reduction in the number of livestock kept (and the associated reduction in the consumption of beef and dairy products), a change in the management of manure (for example, by stabilising it in biogas plants), and less intensive fertiliser application. However, reducing livestock farming may also harm soil quality, the availability of natural fertiliser, etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, indeed, this is something that I took from DeepL.
I have taken a verbatim copy of the suggested text.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@tjarnikova as per other comment, I will let you resolve this one as it is IMPORTANT (and a mistranslation).
8b9bce6
to
8de2789
Compare
@katkolouchova I was checking the text agains the infographic and noticed that the original text is referring to "41%" but the Infographic on the English page shows "42% under "Combustion in industry and construction"-graph. Is there possibly a typo? Actually, I just checked the official published page:
It looks like the Czech Infographic has been updated and contains different numbers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
all checks ok!
Task of #14: Add English texts to the published infographics
Preview Build
Current preview build is available at https://en-facts-on-climate--preview-emissions-eu-trends-g9eu88sf.web.app/infographics/emissions-eu-trends
What does this PR do?
anthropogenicgreenhousegases
.co2eq
for Adding explanatory text to _infographics/climate/emission-pathways-paris.md #17Commented out links: