Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrade lotus-soup testplans and reduce deals concurrency to a single miner #6122

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 28, 2021

Conversation

nonsense
Copy link
Member

This PR is bumping up Go to 1.16.3 for all docker images used in Testground test plans.

It is also reduce concurrency for deals towards a single miner, until we fix the underlying issues with deals being blocked in StorageDealAwaitingPreCommit stage.

Screenshot 2021-04-28 at 14 03 35

time.Sleep(50 * time.Second)
time.Sleep(40 * time.Second)

time.Sleep(time.Duration(t.GlobalSeq) * 5 * time.Second)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The idea here is that we give 5sec. in-between of each deal from various clients, which is certainly more than 1 block time.

build_base_image = "iptestground/oni-buildbase:v13-lotus"
runtime_image = "iptestground/oni-runtime:v8-debug"
build_base_image = "iptestground/oni-buildbase:v14-lotus"
runtime_image = "iptestground/oni-runtime:v9-debug"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've upgraded docker images with latest lotus and lotus-miner binaries (aliased to lll and lm within the images), so that we can debug deadlocked devnets, when a deal ends up in the StorageDealAwaitingPreCommit state.

@magik6k magik6k merged commit 4688da5 into master Apr 28, 2021
@magik6k magik6k deleted the fix-lotus-soup-3-1-deals-end-to-end branch April 28, 2021 12:24
Copy link

@0racl3z 0racl3z left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thx!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants