Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mila/bloom filter add integration test #7045

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 17, 2023

Conversation

milaGGL
Copy link
Contributor

@milaGGL milaGGL commented Feb 16, 2023

Integration Test 1 - Typical Case

  • Create 100 randomly-named documents.
  • Run a query to sync these 100 documents locally with a resume token.
  • Delete 50 of the documents using a transaction (so as not to affect the local cache).
  • Wait 10 seconds, during which the CLC will stop tracking the query and will send an existence filter rather than "delete" events.
  • Re-run the same query from step 2 (which will use the resume token).
  • Verify that a snapshot eventually gets raised with the 50 documents that were not deleted.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 16, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 4cb8e3f

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@milaGGL milaGGL changed the base branch from mila/BloomFilter to master February 16, 2023 21:49
@milaGGL milaGGL changed the base branch from master to mila/BloomFilter February 16, 2023 21:49
@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

google-oss-bot commented Feb 16, 2023

@google-oss-bot
Copy link
Contributor

google-oss-bot commented Feb 16, 2023

@milaGGL milaGGL requested a review from dconeybe February 17, 2023 02:12

// eslint-disable-next-line no-restricted-properties
(persistence ? it.skip : it)(
'can raise expected snapshot when resume query after deleting docs',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider renaming this test to something like "resuming a query should remove deleted documents indicated by existence filter"

() => {
const testDocs = {};
for (let i = 1; i <= 100; i++) {
Object.assign(testDocs, { ['doc' + i]: { key: i } });
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can

Object.assign(testDocs, { ['doc' + i]: { key: i } })

be simplified to

testDocs['doc' + i] = { key: i }

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typescript is not quite happy about with that:
Screenshot 2023-02-16 at 6 26 04 PM

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can convince TypeScript to be happy. Does this work:

Change

const testDocs = {};

to

const testDocs: { [key: string]: Object } = {}; 

txn.delete(doc(coll, 'doc' + i));
}
});
// Wait 10 seconds, during which the watch will stop tracking the query
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: "the watch" -> "Watch" (with a capital "W")

});
// Wait 10 seconds, during which the watch will stop tracking the query
// and will send an existence filter rather than "delete" events.
await (function () {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can

await (function () {
  return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 10000));
})();

be simplified to

await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 10000));

@milaGGL milaGGL requested a review from dconeybe February 17, 2023 02:50
@milaGGL milaGGL merged commit 97ca3ee into mila/BloomFilter Feb 17, 2023
@milaGGL milaGGL deleted the mila/BloomFilter-add-integration-test branch February 17, 2023 23:04
@firebase firebase locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants