Custom binary names

[fosskers]

This PR accounts for [[bin]] sections in Cargo.toml, allowing the specification of custom binary names.

[hisbaan]

Hi! I just checkout out the branch and it seems that while you fixed the issue around strip not being run on the binary, the generated package build still contains the wrong name in some places. For example, with the following Cargo.toml file:

[package]
name = "didyoumean"
authors = ["Hisbaan Noorani"]
version = "1.1.0"
edition = "2021"
license = "GPL-3.0"
description = "A cli spelling corrector"
documentation = "https://github.com/hisbaan/didyoumean"
homepage = "https://github.com/hisbaan/didyoumean"
repository = "https://github.com/hisbaan/didyoumean"
readme = "docs/README.md"
keywords = ["levenshtein", "damerau", "edit-distance"]
categories = ["command-line-utilities"]

[[bin]]
name = "dym"
path = "src/main.rs"

[dependencies]
clap = { version = "3.1.8", features = ["derive"] }
colored = { version = "2" }
cli-clipboard = {version = "0.2.1"}
dialoguer = {version = "0.10.0"}
atty = { version = "0.2.14" }

[target.'cfg(unix)'.dependencies]
nix = { version = "0.23.1" }

[dev-dependencies]
criterion = "0.3"

[[bench]]
name = "edit_distance"
harness = false

the following PKGBUILD is generated

# Maintainer: Hisbaan Noorani
#
# This PKGBUILD was generated by `cargo aur`: https://crates.io/crates/cargo-aur

pkgname=dym-bin
pkgver=1.1.0
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc="A cli spelling corrector"
url="https://github.com/hisbaan/didyoumean"
license=("GPL-3.0")
arch=("x86_64")
provides=("didyoumean")
conflicts=("didyoumean")
source=("https://github.com/hisbaan/didyoumean/releases/download/v$pkgver/didyoumean-$pkgver-x86_64.tar.gz")
sha256sums=("ab689b51e2823c87b8163100613d5ea2632f36e3daae1fb5601d1f4654dc5959")

package() {
    install -Dm755 didyoumean -t "$pkgdir/usr/bin"
    install -Dm644 LICENSE "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/LICENSE"
}

I belive that the name field of the pkgbuild should be the same as the package.name (from before) and the provides/conflicts fields should be the name of the binary. In addition, in the build() function, the file being installed should be the binary and not the package name.

[fosskers]

Thanks for pointing those out.

I believe if the package name should be (in this case) didyoumean-bin, then the provides and conflicts are correct. Those are referring to package names as well, not binaries. But certainly the package() section needs to be corrected.

[fosskers]

Can you try it now?

[hisbaan]

It seems that it is correct now, apart from the provides and conflicts fields which I believe should be the binary that the package provides. Thank you for addressing this :)

Edit: I just read your above comment. I'm new to package builds so I have probably been making them wrong haha 😅. It seems good to me now!