Skip to content

Conversation

Forostovec
Copy link
Contributor

Updated doc comments in crates/common/src/provider/runtime_transport.rs to align with the architecture where retry/backoff (including CUPS) is implemented via RetryBackoffLayer at the provider/client layer. The previous wording implied retries occurred within RuntimeTransport, which was misleading. This corrects the documentation to match actual behavior and prevent incorrect API expectations.

@0xrusowsky 0xrusowsky added the A-docs Area: docs label Sep 7, 2025
DaniPopes added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
This PR aggregates changes from the following PRs:

- Closes #11572 by @\Forostovec
- Closes #11589 by @\sashass1315
- Closes #11592 by @\sashaodessa
- Closes #11595 by @\eeemmmmmm
@DaniPopes DaniPopes mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Done in Foundry Sep 10, 2025
pull bot pushed a commit to antazoey/foundry that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2025
This PR aggregates changes from the following PRs:

- Closes foundry-rs#11572 by @\Forostovec
- Closes foundry-rs#11589 by @\sashass1315
- Closes foundry-rs#11592 by @\sashaodessa
- Closes foundry-rs#11595 by @\eeemmmmmm
@Forostovec Forostovec deleted the docs/runtime-transport-retry-clarification branch September 16, 2025 08:48
MerkleBoy pushed a commit to MerkleBoy/foundry that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2025
This PR aggregates changes from the following PRs:

- Closes foundry-rs#11572 by @\Forostovec
- Closes foundry-rs#11589 by @\sashass1315
- Closes foundry-rs#11592 by @\sashaodessa
- Closes foundry-rs#11595 by @\eeemmmmmm
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: docs
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants