Add support for dissect.btrfs #370
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #370 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.38% 73.90% -0.49%
==========================================
Files 258 259 +1
Lines 20661 20838 +177
==========================================
+ Hits 15369 15400 +31
- Misses 5292 5438 +146
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Miauwkeru
requested changes
Oct 4, 2023
Schamper
force-pushed
the
btrfs-support
branch
from
16f0fde to
bb913ec
Compare
Miauwkeru
previously approved these changes
Nov 7, 2023
Schamper
force-pushed
the
btrfs-support
branch
from
4397025 to
a2d9c53
Compare
|
Now that btrfs is opensource, i'd add it to the |
Miauwkeru
approved these changes
Nov 20, 2023
JSCU-CNI
pushed a commit
to JSCU-CNI/dissect.target
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 2, 2024
Poeloe
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 29, 2024
Zawadidone
pushed a commit
to Zawadidone/dissect.target
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Depends on fox-it/dissect.btrfs#1.
I'm looking for feedback on how I currently implemented multi-volume filesystems + sub-filesystem support. I'm not 100% sure if it isn't too hairy.