Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add lru_cache for UsersPlugin's find method #567

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

Poeloe
Copy link
Contributor

@Poeloe Poeloe commented Mar 6, 2024

DIS-(2754)

@Poeloe Poeloe requested a review from Miauwkeru March 6, 2024 10:04
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 74.31%. Comparing base (12aca2e) to head (0954d19).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #567   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   74.30%   74.31%           
=======================================
  Files         286      286           
  Lines       23612    23617    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        17546    17551    +5     
  Misses       6066     6066           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 74.31% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Poeloe Poeloe force-pushed the feature/add-lru-cache-for-find-in-UsersPlugin branch from c2b9003 to a3764b4 Compare March 6, 2024 21:36
@Poeloe Poeloe merged commit 7e0275f into main Mar 7, 2024
18 checks passed
@Poeloe Poeloe deleted the feature/add-lru-cache-for-find-in-UsersPlugin branch March 7, 2024 13:45
Zawadidone pushed a commit to Zawadidone/dissect.target that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants