Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix duplicated expense_groups #653

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Hrishabh17
Copy link
Contributor

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 commented Jul 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of corporate credit card expenses to ensure more accurate grouping and processing.
  • Refactor

    • Restructured logic for processing expense groups to enhance clarity and maintainability, ensuring that operations only occur when relevant data is present.
    • Consolidated logic for grouping expenses to streamline processing and reduce redundancy.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The refactor of the create_expense_groups_by_report_id_fund_source function enhances clarity and control flow in processing corporate credit card expenses. By restructuring the logic to first check for relevant data, the changes streamline the grouping process, ensuring that operations are performed only when necessary. This results in improved readability and maintainability of the code while preserving its core functionality.

Changes

Files Change Summary
apps/fyle/models.py Refactored create_expense_groups_by_report_id_fund_source to improve clarity and control flow in handling corporate credit card expenses. Grouping logic streamlined, unnecessary operations reduced.

Poem

In fields of code, we hop with glee,
Refactoring makes our logic free!
With clearer paths and grouped delight,
Our rabbit hearts now dance in light.
So here's a cheer for changes bright,
Let's code away, from morn till night! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
245 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 1s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f2cf941 and ef6e76e.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/fyle/models.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
apps/fyle/models.py (9)

408-408: Initialization of filtered_corporate_credit_card_expense_groups.

The new variable filtered_corporate_credit_card_expense_groups is initialized to store grouped expense data. This change is crucial for the subsequent restructuring of the logic.


444-444: Conditional check for corporate_credit_card_expenses.

The restructuring ensures that the grouping logic is executed only when corporate_credit_card_expenses is present. This prevents unnecessary operations.


445-448: Nested condition for corporate_credit_card_expenses_object and split_expense_grouping.

The nested condition improves readability and ensures that the specific logic for handling corporate credit card expenses is executed only when both conditions are met.


449-452: Segregation of expenses without and with bank transactions.

The segregation of ccc_expenses_without_bank_transaction and ccc_expenses_with_bank_transaction allows for a more streamlined approach to processing these expenses.


459-463: Grouping of expenses without bank transactions.

The _group_expenses function is called to group ccc_expenses_without_bank_transaction. This ensures that expenses without bank transactions are processed separately.


465-469: Modification of corporate_credit_card_expense_group_field.

The modification of corporate_credit_card_expense_group_field to exclude expense_number and expense_id and include bank_transaction_id ensures that the grouping logic is correctly applied based on the presence of bank transactions.


470-475: Grouping of expenses with bank transactions.

The _group_expenses function is called again to group ccc_expenses_with_bank_transaction, ensuring that expenses with bank transactions are processed separately.


477-479: Grouping of corporate credit card expenses.

The _group_expenses function is called to group corporate_credit_card_expenses when the nested condition is not met. This ensures that all corporate credit card expenses are processed.


Line range hint 481-486:
Filtering of grouped corporate credit card expenses.

The filter_expense_groups function is called to filter filtered_corporate_credit_card_expense_groups based on the corporate_credit_card_expenses_object. This ensures that the filtering logic is correctly applied.

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
245 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 1s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef6e76e and faa557f.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/fyle/models.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/fyle/models.py

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 added the deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging label Jul 22, 2024
expense_group_settings.split_expense_grouping == 'MULTIPLE_LINE_ITEM'
):
ccc_expenses_without_bank_transaction = [
expense for expense in corporate_credit_card_expenses
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changed expense_objects to corporate_credit_card_expenses

]

ccc_expenses_with_bank_transaction = [
expense for expense in corporate_credit_card_expenses
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

here as well

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between faa557f and 016c4dd.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/fyle/models.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • apps/fyle/models.py

Copy link

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
245 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 7s ⏱️

@Hrishabh17 Hrishabh17 merged commit 42f914c into master Jul 23, 2024
1 check passed
anishfyle pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2024
* fix duplicated expense_groups

* fix expense_objects used
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants