-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 445
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bioperl testing #642
bioperl testing #642
Conversation
???? That should be part of the bioperl dep tree? |
It's not at least not in bioconda. It tried to work on this but it is a huge pain as it touches millions of perl deps: https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/compare/perl_html?expand=1 |
woah. Yuck. :( what to do about this? |
I guess I need to fix the conda package. But this will take some time. |
Btw. @erasche I would be fine to put all tools automatically to all TS that are under conda testing. What do you think? |
@bgruening absolutely, tests pass = should be in TS, in my opinion. If it's on master, we've all agreed we're happy with the software. |
This is for Eric! He probably knows what this means for JBrowse :) @erasche I needed to change the test data. |
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ | |||
<environment_variable name="BOOST_ROOT_DIR" action="set_to">$INSTALL_DIR/boost</environment_variable> | |||
<environment_variable action="prepend_to" name="LD_LIBRARY_PATH">$INSTALL_DIR/boost/lib/</environment_variable> | |||
<environment_variable action="prepend_to" name="LIBRARY_PATH">$INSTALL_DIR/boost/lib/</environment_variable> | |||
<environment_variable action="prepend_to" name="LIBRARY_PATH">$INSTALL_DIR/boost/lib/</environment_variable> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is this a duplicate of the above line?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure why this is here in first place? Bad rebase? Will fix it.
@bgruening <3 <3 <3 That changed test data looks fine to me. |
Your welcome @erasche! :) |
No description provided.