-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 162
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Break loop using ConjugacyClasses on Centralizer in permutation group #3139
Comments
Note that this does not happen with the current |
Cherry picking commit 75f11d9 makes the problem go away. |
This is probably one for @hulpke. While I could determine that
|
Thanks! I worry that
|
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes gap-system#3139
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes gap-system#3139
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes gap-system#3139
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes gap-system#3139
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes gap-system#3139
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes gap-system#3139
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes gap-system#3139
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes gap-system#3139
If the group has been obtained as subgroup from a fitting free computation, the data will be inherited and might not guarantee that the factor group really is fitting free. Test/resolve this. This fixes #3139
GAP has trouble computing conjugacy classes in certain subgroups of a permutation group. I observed the problem in the ubuntu gap (4.8.8) and tried the latest release, but got the same result.
The reproducer code is:
One can use:
ConjugacyClasses( Group( GeneratorsOfGroup( badsubgroup ) ) );
to get the conjugacy classes, so it is something wrong with stored attributes. The trouble does not show up if the original group is solvable. The bad subgroup is solvable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: