-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Particle system - Part 1 #516
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Carlos Agüero <caguero@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Agüero <caguero@openrobotics.org>
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## ign-gazebo4 #516 +/- ##
===============================================
+ Coverage 77.37% 77.61% +0.23%
===============================================
Files 217 213 -4
Lines 12217 11624 -593
===============================================
- Hits 9453 9022 -431
+ Misses 2764 2602 -162
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
…ter. Signed-off-by: Carlos Agüero <caguero@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Agüero <caguero@openrobotics.org>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for iterating!
@caguero , would you prefer merging these PRs as they are approved, or should we wait until all the functionality is working and approved before merging all PRs? Note that this is targeting a stable release branch, and whatever is merged in an intermediary state may be released at any point. |
We can review part1, part2 and part3 and merge them all at once when we're happy with it. These three PRs offer the basic integration. Part4 (coming up) is more independent. |
Got it. I converted this to draft so that we don't merge it by mistake. |
I'm noticing the following error in CI:
I believe that we need to make an |
I'm fine with a release, my only request is that we make sure the current particle message has all we need, because this will go into a stable release, and we won't be able to tweak any fields afterwards. So maybe it's best to wait until all parts are out beforehand. But if @iche033 thinks the implementation is already settled, then go for it. |
Good point. I am still reviewing the other particle system PRs, so I will make a release once we know all of the other PRs are good to go 👍 |
yeah let's hold off until we have everything reviewed and ready to go. There's still some work left that need to be on on particles this week. |
Signed-off-by: Carlos Agüero <caguero@osrfoundation.org> Co-authored-by: Ashton Larkin <ashton@openrobotics.org> Co-authored-by: Ian Chen <ichen@osrfoundation.org>
fdb02c2
to
e77e376
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A few minor comments that would be nice to address before merging, but I'm fine with merging this PR as-is.
Signed-off-by: Ian Chen <ichen@osrfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
Signed-off-by: Nate Koenig <nate@openrobotics.org>
It depends on gazebosim/gz-msgs#127 .
The goal is to integrate a particle system that can use the particle emitters available in Ignition Rendering.
This patch focuses on the creation of a new
ParticleEmitter
component.