-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adding GCI to infer part-of edges for morphogenesis. Addresses #12658 #24280
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@balhoff do we have a way of testing the generative capacities? for now I am just running by hand:
This is producing two flavors of GCI as expected - next step is to hook up materialize |
I think we'll want to create separate YAMLs just to generate the GCIs, right? Otherwise we're going to create extra labels, etc. I'm doing something like this for Biochebi: https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/blob/master/src/biochebi/biochebi_gcis.yaml |
We are already materializing 'part of', so if we import the GCIs it should just work. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did a check and find that including the GCIs in the DP causes the DP match query to find no results (since the GCI doesn't exist in the ontology). I think we should keep the GCIs in a separate generative file, since we use these files for matching.
@cmungall I made several additions to the PR, to separate out the GCI pattern, and add generation steps to the makefile. What is a test case part_of we should be looking for? |
Two resulting term equivalences: |
regulation of cell morphogenesis involved in differentiation EquivalentTo regulation of cell morphogenesis
|
OK, let's leave the GCIs in a seperate file for now, but these are already quite repetitious, involving repetition of information from other patterns. It might be an idea to have an option on match to selectively match on equivalence axioms, since that is the main use case |
Shall we make a separate issue with the proposal to merge cell morphogenesis involved in differentiation? We can include the explanation there (we don't need to discuss the regulation since it trivially follows) |
|
No description provided.