feat(grouping): Exclude sentry-java sdk frames from group and inapp

[romtsn]

This is necessary for the sentry-java sdk to not mess up grouping, because we'll start sending sdk frames for fatals from the next major version (relevant pr: getsentry/sentry-java#3021)

Also changed io.sentry to com.example in stacktrace-collapse-recursion snapshot so it's not affected by this change

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #60691 (949e716) into master (984e550) will increase coverage by 0.12%.
Report is 20 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #60691      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.76%   80.88%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files        5185     5185              
  Lines      227509   227514       +5     
  Branches    38244    38247       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits       183742   184029     +287     
+ Misses      38143    37861     -282     
  Partials     5624     5624              

see 77 files with indirect coverage changes

[lobsterkatie]

So, if I understand correctly, this doesn't affect current issues, just ones which will come from the new version of the SDK. Is that right?

[romtsn]

So, if I understand correctly, this doesn't affect current issues, just ones which will come from the new version of the SDK. Is that right?

yes, that's right!

[romtsn]

@lobsterkatie can we get this approved, or do you see any problems with that? :)

[kahest]

@lobsterkatie also just to be 100% sure - once this is merged, the new rule is applied immediately for new events, correct?

[lobsterkatie]

Yes, it will be applied immediately. But I checked out getsentry/sentry-java#3021 and it seems like currently, no events have sentry frames, correct? If that's true, then this is fine to merge.

[romtsn]

@lobsterkatie yep, correct. Could you please give an approval then?

[lobsterkatie]

Yup! 🚢