Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting temp=0 does not work as expected #684

Closed
4 tasks done
abetlen opened this issue Apr 1, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #720
Closed
4 tasks done

Setting temp=0 does not work as expected #684

abetlen opened this issue Apr 1, 2023 · 3 comments · Fixed by #720

Comments

@abetlen
Copy link
Collaborator

abetlen commented Apr 1, 2023

Prerequisites

Please answer the following questions for yourself before submitting an issue.

  • I am running the latest code. Development is very rapid so there are no tagged versions as of now.
  • I carefully followed the README.md.
  • I searched using keywords relevant to my issue to make sure that I am creating a new issue that is not already open (or closed).
  • I reviewed the Discussions, and have a new bug or useful enhancement to share.

Expected Behavior

Setting sampling temperature to 0 should produce valid and "predictable" tokens.

Current Behavior

Setting temperature to 0 causes sampling to fail completely. This is due to plogits being scaled by 1.0f/temp before sampling here. I believe a workaround for this would be to make sampling deterministic when temp==0 by setting top_p=0.0 and top_k=1 and setting temp>0.

@Fabio3rs
Copy link
Contributor

Fabio3rs commented Apr 1, 2023

Hi, I did a PR trying to fix this, can you test it?
#689

Thanks

@ivanstepanovftw

This comment was marked as resolved.

@ivanstepanovftw
Copy link
Collaborator

ivanstepanovftw commented Apr 2, 2023

Why not just handle the case explicitly as https://github.com/facebookresearch/llama/compare/main...shawwn:llama:main does?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants