Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
impl
GodotFfi
forOption<T>
whenT
is pointer sized and nullable #240 #247impl
GodotFfi
forOption<T>
whenT
is pointer sized and nullable #240 #247Changes from all commits
1fb9642
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it looks like it should be possible to add these tests to the
build.rs
so they get auto-generated, can you do that if it is? dont worry about it if it would require rewriting the macro or something tho.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The test generation does currently not play very well with
Option
. We need different tests for bothSome(...)
andNone
but the tests derive their name from the rust type. That makes it impossible to have tests for the same type with different values.The
accept
methods are also implemented slightly different from what the code generation does because they operate on and checkOptions
. I thought it's easier to just implement the tests manually, than to expand the complexity of the macros.