Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: add cluster command end to end test #179

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2024

Conversation

JeffreyDallas
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This pull request changes the following:

  • Adding an end-to-end test for cluster command

Related Issues

Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Tang <jeffrey@swirldslabs.com>
Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results

  1 files   16 suites   1m 9s ⏱️
109 tests 109 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
134 runs  134 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit f215228.

Copy link
Contributor

E2E Test Results

63 tests   63 ✅  6m 20s ⏱️
 8 suites   0 💤
 1 files     0 ❌

Results for commit f215228.

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
Report missing for 542d5ad1 100.00%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (542d5ad) Report Missing Report Missing Report Missing
Head commit (f215228) 2601 1900 73.05%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#179) 13 13 100.00%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

You may notice some variations in coverage metrics with the latest Coverage engine update. For more details, visit the documentation

Footnotes

  1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.70%. Comparing base (a27d1d2) to head (f215228).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #179      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.14%   72.70%   +3.56%     
==========================================
  Files          32       32              
  Lines        3095     3111      +16     
  Branches      478      553      +75     
==========================================
+ Hits         2140     2262     +122     
+ Misses        955      849     -106     
Files Coverage Δ
src/commands/cluster.mjs 58.91% <100.00%> (+58.91%) ⬆️
test/test_util.js 90.47% <100.00%> (+3.33%) ⬆️

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

Impacted file tree graph

@JeffreyDallas JeffreyDallas merged commit 48c5b77 into main Mar 23, 2024
17 checks passed
@JeffreyDallas JeffreyDallas deleted the 00137-D-add-cluster-e2e branch March 23, 2024 14:01
@swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.23.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement e2e tests for cluster command
3 participants