Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/aws sagemaker instance update #8880

Conversation

kylebechtel77
Copy link

This is just an updated PR based on this PR by @jckuester
#8011

Merge conflicts have been fixed and I will try to keep up with any feedback made on this PR.

I'm fairly new at this so let me know if I did anything incorrectly here, thanks!

Changes proposed in this pull request:

Adapt aws_sagemaker_instance resource to the latest API changes

@ghost ghost added size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. service/sagemaker Issues and PRs that pertain to the sagemaker service. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. labels Jun 5, 2019
@aeschright aeschright requested a review from a team June 28, 2019 18:14
@ltupin
Copy link

ltupin commented Jul 31, 2019

Hi there ! Is there any thing block this PR ? We will be happy to use notebookInstance.DefaultCodeRepository :-D !

@kylebechtel77
Copy link
Author

@ltupin Not to my knowledge, just waiting for it to be reviewed.
I'm also excited about the notebookInstance.DefaultCodeRepository!

@ltupin
Copy link

ltupin commented Aug 5, 2019

Dear reviewers team could you please check and review this PR :-D ?

@jckuester
Copy link
Contributor

@kylebechtel77 there are still a few comments and TODOs in the code that I left in my old PR. Do you want me to work on those? I think, I can find some time next week to finish them.

@kylebechtel77
Copy link
Author

@jckuester That would be great!

@kylebechtel77
Copy link
Author

@bflad I know you were watching @jckuester PR on this before, is there anything else we need to do to get this merged?

I know @jckuester has some todo's he'd like to take care of, but that can be a separate PR, myself and @ltupin need the functionality thats already in here sooner rather than later.

@delwaterman
Copy link

+1 on getting this reviewed and merged

@bflad bflad added the enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. label Jan 29, 2020
@DrFaust92
Copy link
Collaborator

hey @kylebechtel77 , do you mind rebasing this?

@Andeloth
Copy link

Could we get this reviewed and merged? Some of the projects I'm working on will need the extra options that are included here.

@jckuester
Copy link
Contributor

jckuester commented Jun 29, 2020

Hi @bflad, I once started this PR and would like to help to finish what I started: As the scope "sagemaker instance update" is probably too broad, would it help you if I split this PR up into smaller PRs for one attribute each (e.g., one for accelerator_types, additional_code_repositories, etc)?

@DrFaust92
Copy link
Collaborator

DrFaust92 commented Aug 23, 2020

Hey @jckuester, I think it would be best to split the update functionally to existing arguments and open separate PRs for new arguments (there are also a few existing ones for some of the ones added here but the do not handle update)

@DrFaust92
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this in favour of #15385 that been merged. thanks for all your work on this!

@DrFaust92 DrFaust92 closed this Oct 22, 2020
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 22, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 22, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/sagemaker Issues and PRs that pertain to the sagemaker service. size/XL Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants